Dale Steyn vs Wasim Akram vs Curtly Ambrose

[vcs]

This is usually how PFK compares players:

Let us use madeup metric M, and thereby assign random number X to player P1, and Y to player P2. Since X < Y, P1 < P2, hence proved.

 

[Pap Finn Keighl]

How could you adjust it though from 78 to 98 tests like that ? Would Akram's performance be the same if he played those 20 tests ?

Ambrose wicket per innings - 2.26

Akram wicket per innings in different phases
Debut - retirement - 2.29
Debut - Ambrose retirement - 2.34
During Ambrose career - 2.48

 

[Pap Finn Keighl]

So Sachin plan must be better than Sobers plan or Bradman plan then.

I dont remember Sachin averaging 100 for 20 years.

 

[h_hurricane]

This is usually how PFK compares players:

Let us use madeup metric M, and thereby assign random number X to player P1, and Y to player P2. Since X < Y, P1 < P2, hence proved.

Inductive deduction or deductive induction. If ducks were like geese, they would fly and fly better.

 

[h_hurricane]

I dont remember Sachin averaging 100 for 20 years.

Bradman only played 12 years though outside the years he lost in WW2. If you consider Sachin as roughly 54% Bradman, Bradman plan gives you 12 million dollars and Sachin plan 12.96 million dollars.

 

[Pap Finn Keighl]

Bradman only played 12 years though outside the years he lost in WW2. If you consider Sachin as roughly 54% Bradman, Bradman plan gives you 12 million dollars and Sachin plan 12.96 million dollars.

Only if Sachin averaged 100 in 12 years stretch then