StephenZA
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I apologise I should have not said Afrikaans, I should have said South African white blokey culture... which is very dominant within sports team in SA.Because I am a pedant I would point out that it was far more likely that it was English-speaking culture dominant in the Proteas at the time, given the role of people like Smith, Boucher, and Kallis, none of whom are Afrikaners.
I am not saying that he should have been kept on, I am saying I can understand and empathise why he would be aggrieved. I think he is saying what he felt now because quite obviously this is an opportune time to say it, but I would not call it bandwagonning. It is not like he does not have the exposure already. As regards extra effort to welcome him being made, it is possible that is true, but it would contradict my entire life experience in SA.And with regard to your point about getting a milestone, perhaps, but Ntini needed 30 wickets to overtake Pollock, he'd taken two in his final two Tests - can we really think it's acceptable to keep him in the team to break the record (also given that he already held a number of records, best bowling in a Test match, first SAn to take ten wickets at Lord's).
And Ntini claims he was dropped from the contract liost, that is a lie. He was given a contract for the 2010-11 season, which also makes me raise my eyebrows.
https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/22652399/sa-board-retains-corrie-van-zyl,-graeme-smith-
Now I'm not saying that Ntini didn't face challenges that would make you or I blanche, but this really does seem like bandwagonning to me. And just as we can speculate that people only accepted Ntini because 'he had to be there' it is also possible that an extra effort was made to make him feel welcome.
My simple point is nothing he has said or that I've heard reported recently surprises me, it saddens me, does not surprise me and it is rather more believable than not. Your experience may be very different.