Thats nothing new regardless of bias...Yeah that one wasn't dodgy imo but the ones before were questionable tstl. Especially the Archer non-no ball.
Yep. Would've been particularly useful last year, for one...I like the idea of three reviews even if there’s neutral umps tbh.
Maybe he didn't want to come across? Comms mentioned that a few players, including Bravo and Hetmeyer, chose not to join the tour.Is Cottrell a LO pick only for the Windies? Left arm variety might be handy to have on tour if you’re playing four quicks
Why not 5 or 10? I don't think that would lead to watching review after review.I like the idea of three reviews even if there’s neutral umps tbh.
Maybe he didn't want to come across? Comms mentioned that a few players, including Bravo and Hetmeyer, chose not to join the tour.Is Cottrell a LO pick only for the Windies? Left arm variety might be handy to have on tour if you’re playing four quicks
He's a really average red-ball bowler, average in WIndies FC cricket isn't anything special and did poorly in the two Tests he did play.Is Cottrell a LO pick only for the Windies? Left arm variety might be handy to have on tour if you’re playing four quicks
This sort of logic annoys me so much. DRS is not a get out of jail free card for bad umpiring!All this talk of biased umpiring is fairly irrelevant at this point as every decision ultimately has been correct unless I’m forgetting any?
Lol indeed. The “haha you shouldn’t have burned your review” brigade completely ignores that whether you’ve got no reviews left or 50, if it’s three reds it’s ****ing out. Umpires getting let off the hook because a side has already used its reviews is crap.This sort of logic annoys me so much. DRS is not a get out of jail free card for bad umpiring!