• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* West Indies Tour of England 2020

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I don't think any of these decisions except maybe the Burns decision was terrible -- although you would expect the Archer one to be given most times -- but it is weird.
Yeah, to me the weird part is they seem to be going with the direction of England when in doubt. I feel they should have been consistent in favoring the batting side when in doubt. That just makes the game simpler, even if they make mistakes.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
We needed that one, and let's see if we can follow it up. But surely Anderson's spell is almost over.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Anderson showing why he is that good once again. I can see many bowlers who would have given up after those early close calls. He kept at it. HIs mental strength and discipline as a bowler are amazing and makes him stand out from the others.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah, to me the weird part is they seem to be going with the direction of England when in doubt. I feel they should have been consistent in favoring the batting side when in doubt. That just makes the game simpler, even if they make mistakes.
I mean the sample size here is tiny.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I mean the sample size here is tiny.
Yeah and I am not even saying they are biased. Its just that they end up going with the decision that benefits England each time. That is all. I mean, its not one of the 5, but the first over leave of Burns off Roach was more out than either of the Anderson overturned ones.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
It’s possible that the umpires were influenced into thinking those LBW’s were hitting by the ones they didn’t give earlier. Any claims of bias is nonsense, there’s just no point.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Kinda lucky the decisions were as bad as they were, imagine if they gave England 5 straight umpire’s calls.
 

Top