Ryan Harris retiring just before the last Ashes left a massive hole in Australia's attack.
Hey Burgey do you reckon Ryan Harris retiring had any impact whatsoever on the 2015 Ashes?Ryan Harris retiring cost Australia any chance of the 2015 Ashes
Ryan Harris retiring just before the last Ashes left a massive hole in Australia's attack.
Hey Burgey do you reckon Ryan Harris retiring had any impact whatsoever on the 2015 Ashes?Ryan Harris retiring cost Australia any chance of the 2015 Ashes
The immediate impact was probably lessened at the time because of the fixture list. The next series after the 2007 retirements were Sri Lanka at home and India away, which just about went the way they usually did when Warne and McGrath were in the team. It didn't look like a demonstrably weaker side until the next summer when they lost at home to SA (and Gilchrist was also gone).Martyn-Warne-McGrath-Langer in the same series was a pretty big blow, especially considering that Hayden and Gilchrist were both past their peak and on the downhill too, and MacGill was crocked.
Yeah he's got impossible boots to fill. Literally only one other player in history could have replaced him, and he retired 50 years ago.Kallis's retirement is still causing reverberations in the SA cricket team...
That last sentence was the saddest part of it all. With a better body MacGill could have been a regular for another 5 years based on his age. But he only later to 35, which is young for a retiring spinner.Martyn-Warne-McGrath-Langer in the same series was a pretty big blow, especially considering that Hayden and Gilchrist were both past their peak and on the downhill too, and MacGill was crocked.
Pretty **** that Aus had all of Warne, MacGill, Hogg going simultaneously and they all finished up about the same time. Would have been nice to spread those 3 over about 30 years rather than have them wasted playing mostly domestic cricket.That last sentence was the saddest part of it all. With a better body MacGill could have been a regular for another 5 years based on his age. But he only later to 35, which use young for a retiring spinner.
Lyon will leave a giant hole when he goes.
Hogg didn't even play a huge amount of red ball cricket, probably because the WACA is garbage for spinners, but still.Pretty **** that Aus had all of Warne, MacGill, Hogg going simultaneously and they all finished up about the same time. Would have been nice to spread those 3 over about 30 years rather than have them wasted playing mostly domestic cricket.
Yeah with Hogg I was talking more about short form. Can't help but wonder how good an ODI bowler MacGill could have been, he had an incredible domestic record for NSW.Hogg didn't even play a huge amount of red ball cricket, probably because the WACA is garbage for spinners, but still.
Other than an incredible 1999-2000 season Langer didn't do much at 3. But for that one season he was Bradmanesque.He was a bit up and down tbh. Was always like he was playing for his spot. Not terrible, but three is such an important spot. The difference having a ~45 to 50 odd-average three makes to your line up is so big. Memory might be playing tricks on me but Langer at three reminded me more of Khawaja than Labushagne.
If Labushagne ends up a 50 average number three, the next 3-5 years for Australia looks really good. Smith behind him at four makes it a very good middle order to bat around.
in theory we have reasonable prospects waiting for an extended chance (young, conway, phillips + blundell, cleaver, seifert)- Watling & Ross