ankitj
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Who you mean?Nothing like having to bat players out of position to accommodate the available keeper.
Who you mean?Nothing like having to bat players out of position to accommodate the available keeper.
Quinton de Kock is an opener but Teuton needed a number 6.Who you mean?
You missed out by not doing the alphabetical drafts man.would a test version of this draft work?
I like chronological drafts generally. Love when old players need to be picked and given a fair shakeYou missed out by not doing the alphabetical drafts man.
For sure. I was only commenting on the absurdity of having de Kock and batting him at six or shuffling the entire rest of the order down.Klusener has his lower order batting covered.
Fair enough. What did you think of the variable turn order in this one?I like chronological drafts generally. Love when old players need to be picked and given a fair shake
I now have 2 specialist openers. Lara could have subbed in but not required now and can bat in the middle order. In actuality he opened in ~18% of his ODI innings so hardly a must start there. Ranatunga was always my preferred 6 anyway .Quinton de Kock is an opener but Teuton needed a number 6.
Didn't he mostly bat 5? I mean there's not a huge amount of difference I guess.I now have 2 specialist openers. Lara could have subbed in but not required now and can bat in the middle order. In actuality he opened in ~18% of his ODI innings so hardly a must start there. Ranatunga was always my preferred 6 anyway .