Line and Length
Cricketer Of The Year
An over in cricket has been standardised to 6 balls for some time now. Did the change from 8 to 6 affect the balls/hour rate?
Surely the balls per hour rate must also suffer if there are more over charges in an hour.
Starfighter posted an excellent graph related to this under "Cricket Related Stuff That Doesn't Deserve a Thread" and perhaps I should be responding there.
As a bowler I played under both 6 and 8 ball over eras and much preferred the 8 ball format. It gave me more opportunity to work on a plan to dismiss a batsman. 5 or 6 "stock" balls with 2 or 3 variations in an attempt to confuse and remove a batsman. The 6 ball format seemed to limit the options.
I note that there was to have been a 10 ball over trial this year according to one article I read. This was only for T20 cricket.
Here are excerpts from that article and the source for those who might wish to read further.
"The six-ball over will be abandoned for the first time in 72 years of English domestic competition as part of the controversial new Hundred competition approved this week by the England and Wales Cricket Board.
The ECB has rubber-stamped the fast-paced format, subject to county approval, in which deliveries are bowled in clutches of 10. A 10-ball "over" would be from one end - five balls by one bowler, then five by another; or all 10 by one.
Officials said they had been working with the MCC to obtain the consent over the break in tradition on over rules.
The idea is to cut down on the time taken changing ends from 19 switches in a Twenty20 match to 10 in the Hundred. It is hoped the Hundred will be a much quicker game than Twenty20, which the ECB believes will attract a new audience.
The format, likely to be introduced in 2020, is part of a new ECB five-year strategy. A handful of counties are understood to be in opposition, but the ECB insists it will broaden the game's appeal."
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-new-english-competition-20181130-p50jan.html
Surely the balls per hour rate must also suffer if there are more over charges in an hour.
Starfighter posted an excellent graph related to this under "Cricket Related Stuff That Doesn't Deserve a Thread" and perhaps I should be responding there.
As a bowler I played under both 6 and 8 ball over eras and much preferred the 8 ball format. It gave me more opportunity to work on a plan to dismiss a batsman. 5 or 6 "stock" balls with 2 or 3 variations in an attempt to confuse and remove a batsman. The 6 ball format seemed to limit the options.
I note that there was to have been a 10 ball over trial this year according to one article I read. This was only for T20 cricket.
Here are excerpts from that article and the source for those who might wish to read further.
"The six-ball over will be abandoned for the first time in 72 years of English domestic competition as part of the controversial new Hundred competition approved this week by the England and Wales Cricket Board.
The ECB has rubber-stamped the fast-paced format, subject to county approval, in which deliveries are bowled in clutches of 10. A 10-ball "over" would be from one end - five balls by one bowler, then five by another; or all 10 by one.
Officials said they had been working with the MCC to obtain the consent over the break in tradition on over rules.
The idea is to cut down on the time taken changing ends from 19 switches in a Twenty20 match to 10 in the Hundred. It is hoped the Hundred will be a much quicker game than Twenty20, which the ECB believes will attract a new audience.
The format, likely to be introduced in 2020, is part of a new ECB five-year strategy. A handful of counties are understood to be in opposition, but the ECB insists it will broaden the game's appeal."
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...-new-english-competition-20181130-p50jan.html