honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I think Sir Geoffery said "my mum cud ve hit that with a stick of rhubarb" a lot more than he said "grandma or nan"...
He beat his wife with more than a stick of rhubarb though.I think Sir Geoffery said "my mum cud ve hit that with a stick of rhubarb" a lot more than he said "grandma or nan"...
such as?My list will have to rectify the appalling Australian revisionism in some of these lists
He means that I put Gavaskar below a bunch of other players and called out the fact that a lot of his supposed greatness against the West Indies happened on massive roads or in matches where the Windies fielded substandard attacks. 70/71 he averaged 150 against the Windies when they fielded an utterly terrible bowling attack.such as?
If we're going to start this game it kind of defeats the whole point of the exercise
Maybe I'll have to post a list of 15 Australians to "rectify" your list
such as?
Hobbs
Hutton
Sutcliffe
Simpson
B Richards
Hayden
Ponsford
Woodfull
Lawry
Morris
Trumper
Gavaskar
G Smith
Greenidge
Sehwag
Tbf the TNT list isn't Australian revisionism as much as it's quirkySimpson
Amiss
Hayden
Katich
Gavaskar
Sehwag
Warner
Smith
Langer
Boycott
Gibbs
Lawry
Anwar
Barlow
Turner
Stephen's list isn't unreasonable at all. Australia have had a lot of great opening batsmen and been playing a lot longer than most other teams, not particular surprising that he put 7 Aussies in there. Any less than 5 would probably be too much the other way tbhTbf the TNT list isn't Australian revisionism as much as it's quirky
My list is not in order of greatness but a list of the best 15 openers I think have been the best.Stephen's list isn't unreasonable at all. Australia have had a lot of great opening batsmen and been playing a lot longer than most other teams, not particular surprising that he put 7 Aussies in there. Any less than 5 would probably be too much the other way tbh
TNT's top 4 is very questionable though
Of course not. Nothing unreasonable about that listStephen's list isn't unreasonable at all.
exactly. We had this exact same whinging in the spinner thread. The whole point of this sort of exercise is to see what cricketweb comes up with, it's not supposed to be an ultimate definitive ranking.there's always gonna be some questionable placings and disagreements but that's part of it
I know you think Gavakaskr should be higher than all those aussies but stephen gave his reasons
In the spinner one, Warne featured at the bottom of one list, O'Reilly missed an entire list and Murali missed 2
All three ended up in the top 3 so really all of those lists having them nowhere near their top 10 look manipulated/dodgy - i figure the Murali ones were protests about his action and then the Warne and O'Reilly omissions counter-attacks at that
Let's all try to give our honest opinion and not get too petty by trying to counter what we think are 'wrong' lists
is this sarcasmOf course not. Nothing unreasonable about that list