Right now he is the non playing coach. Wouldn't mind taking him into the team though. Versatile, insightful and full of cricketing acumen.You have left out the Bradman, PEWS. I don't think he has retired yet.
Burgey definitely the finger spinner. He's a wily character, got a lot of tricks up his sleeveGotta make room for PEWS, the ruthless run accumulating machine. Social also likely to buy his way into the XI through his nefarious connections in the middle east.
Presume Burgey is the finger spinner?
Nailed it.Presume Burgey is the finger spinner?
I am sure Burgey and AT (and possibly a few others) are from the class of 1960s.Terribly modern team, no respect for the legends.
At least include the bloke who actually played for Australia and at an U19 World Cup
This whole Symonds thing has been pretty tiresome tbh. I'm more interested in the discussion re. the value of fielding ability in general but no one can seem to separate the topic from Symonds himself in their minds.
I've been arguing (sort of) pro-Symonds ITT not so much because I really think he should be in an ATG team, but more so in response to some posting from others that has ben severely underrating him as a player
How much discussion here has happened on merit of picking a fringe Indian player in ATG XI like Rohit or Kapil vs. how much for Symonds? It's become a meme now.
Every single person here says that he is bored of talking about Symonds but continues talking about Symonds.
For the most part I've included both Kapil and Symonds in my ATG world XI.Funny you should ask, as it wasn't too long ago where multiple threads were inundated with pro-Kapil spamming in almost that exact context IIRC that made this whole Symonds thing look tame by comparison
And from what I've seen it seems like an unfair anti-Symonds sentiment that is fuelling this discussion just as much, if not more than pro-Symonds bias
Can I please bat at #4?An ATG Aussie CW XI
Jimmy101
Mr_Mister
Spark(c)
Aussie Tragic
Red Hill
Stephen
TJB
Coronis
StarFighter
The Big Bambino
Burgey
Jimmy and MM provide the much needed calming assurance at the top. Spark controls the proceedings in the middle order with an explosive lineup to follow. Stephen is a master of tricky chases with TJB providing great support. Burgey leads the bowling pack with a great skill to hunt down opposition's best batsman when it matters the most.
One could create a second ATG XI as well but this will be difficult to beat for me.
I think it's a stretch to have Ambrose there. Not because he wasn't good enough, rather because he played so little. Jerome Taylor should replace him.Windies team of the 2000s:
1. Gayle
2. Chanderpaul
3. Sarwan
4. Lara
5. Marlon Samuels
6. DJ Bravo
7. D. Ramdin
8. Mervyn Dillon
9. Reon King
10. Curtly Ambrose
11. Fidel Edwards
Standbys: Jerome Taylor, Cameron Cuffy, Ridley Jacobs, Carl Hooper.
I'd take 2000s Ambrose over 2000s WalshOr I suppose if Ambrose is to be selected in a 2000's side, Walsh should be too, as he kicked on for a little bit longer.
No disputes here. Just gotta remember that big Curtly only played for roughly 6 months during the entire decade.I'd take 2000s Ambrose over 2000s Walsh