• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in South Africa 2019/20

greg

International Debutant
Is Root actually capable of not reviewing after a turned down appeal?

England urgently need to do some thinking and put in place a sensible protocol for when they will use them.
 
Last edited:

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Is Root actually capable of not reviewing after a turned down appeal?

England urgently need to do some thinking and put in place a sensible protocol for when they will use them.
Seeing as last year they got more calls overturned than the next 2 best teams at at getting decisions overturned did put together, they must be doing something right.
 

Dendarii

International Debutant
Pretorius has looked solid even though I can't quite fathom his selection in this particular match. When Philander retires though, he makes sense as a no.8 / 4th bowler. You could do a lot worse.
The problem is that the only way he fits into the team is as a number 7/fourth seamer, and that's one position too high in the batting order for him.
 

greg

International Debutant
Seeing as last year they got more calls overturned than the next 2 best teams at at getting decisions overturned did put together, they must be doing something right.
Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?
 
Last edited:

Woodster

International Captain
Fantastic effort from Wood! Consistently our quickest bowler and just as vital (if not more so) to this side than Archer. Be nice to see them both at full throttle on a quick deck.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Nice one Wood, now hopefully he can remain fit and be of use in the future instead of missing another couple of series. When he bowls at this pace he is an asset, when he is half fit and bowling slower than Broad he is pointless.
 

Bijed

International Regular
Fantastic effort from Wood! Consistently our quickest bowler and just as vital (if not more so) to this side than Archer. Be nice to see them both at full throttle on a quick deck.
Yeah, pleased to see him do well two tests in a row with not much of a break, previously he's struggled with back-to-back fixtures
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?
They had a lot of chances due to poor umpiring in the Ashes. No idea how good the percentage is, but far better than Tim Paine's that's for sure.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?
Someone did a thread on it on here the other week. They did make more referrals than any other team but overall percentage wise it was there or thereabouts.

IMO it’s not a problem wasting a review so long as a team don’t run out and then miss out because they couldn’t review something they’ll at was a wrong call.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Relax guy, you are sounding like a stuck record. I just hope your team you support has never been in a slump
Yeah it is difficult to be too hard on South Africa given they have lost a bunch of great players to retirement and the replacement bowling attack to Kolpak deals in recent years. No side could cope with that without a drop off in results. The key thing is how quickly they can rebuild.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Yeah it is difficult to be too hard on South Africa given they have lost a bunch of great players to retirement and the replacement bowling attack to Kolpak deals in recent years. No side could cope with that without a drop off in results. The key thing is how quickly they can rebuild.
It doesn't help that they are having a series where the team is just shattered. Players like Rabada, de Kock, Elgar and Maharaj would walk into most sides. And they have promising finds too like Nortje and to a lesser extent Pretorius.

Kolpaks jumping ship doesn't help, but it has only really affected their bowling depth rather than the strength of their first XI. With everyone fit I don't think Olivier for example gets a game. They're only missing him now because they've got Rabada banned, Philander creaking and Maharaj dumped brainlessly.

Yeah they have a fragile batting lineup right now but so do England and they've found a way to make it work in this series. I'm sure SA will be back.
 
Last edited:

Top