Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
He'd need to improve his play against spin to bat that low though.Potentially bad opinion here, I think Markram should be at 4 or 5.
He'd need to improve his play against spin to bat that low though.Potentially bad opinion here, I think Markram should be at 4 or 5.
Seeing as last year they got more calls overturned than the next 2 best teams at at getting decisions overturned did put together, they must be doing something right.Is Root actually capable of not reviewing after a turned down appeal?
England urgently need to do some thinking and put in place a sensible protocol for when they will use them.
The problem is that the only way he fits into the team is as a number 7/fourth seamer, and that's one position too high in the batting order for him.Pretorius has looked solid even though I can't quite fathom his selection in this particular match. When Philander retires though, he makes sense as a no.8 / 4th bowler. You could do a lot worse.
Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?Seeing as last year they got more calls overturned than the next 2 best teams at at getting decisions overturned did put together, they must be doing something right.
Yeah, pleased to see him do well two tests in a row with not much of a break, previously he's struggled with back-to-back fixturesFantastic effort from Wood! Consistently our quickest bowler and just as vital (if not more so) to this side than Archer. Be nice to see them both at full throttle on a quick deck.
They had a lot of chances due to poor umpiring in the Ashes. No idea how good the percentage is, but far better than Tim Paine's that's for sure.Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?
Someone did a thread on it on here the other week. They did make more referrals than any other team but overall percentage wise it was there or thereabouts.Really? Interesting - is there a breakdown on this? Eg. How many when batting/in the field and how many caught/LBW. And the overall percentages. Eg. Are England supposedly “good” or other teams even worse?
Relax guy, you are sounding like a stuck record. I just hope your team you support has never been in a slumpSouth Africa are fragile cricket team since AB retire
Yeah it is difficult to be too hard on South Africa given they have lost a bunch of great players to retirement and the replacement bowling attack to Kolpak deals in recent years. No side could cope with that without a drop off in results. The key thing is how quickly they can rebuild.Relax guy, you are sounding like a stuck record. I just hope your team you support has never been in a slump
That'll be be news to him.Faf not even made a note worth score this series surely he retires from test cricket considering he 38 now.
It doesn't help that they are having a series where the team is just shattered. Players like Rabada, de Kock, Elgar and Maharaj would walk into most sides. And they have promising finds too like Nortje and to a lesser extent Pretorius.Yeah it is difficult to be too hard on South Africa given they have lost a bunch of great players to retirement and the replacement bowling attack to Kolpak deals in recent years. No side could cope with that without a drop off in results. The key thing is how quickly they can rebuild.
You think its funny for a international standard batsman to be hopping while getting out lbw every 2 inningsThat'll be be news to him.