The situation we have found ourselves in is so tough. How much rope do we give him ? Theunis' rope was so odd and so many gaps in between games but he just looked like someone who was too serious & it would be a struggle for him to make it into international level with every failure.We had high hopes for Hamza, but now the question may need to be asked as to whether he's another Duminy/De Bruyn who isn't able to take his domestic form up to test level.
This is his 5th test and KP is talking ****... He is starting off at 3 in a struggling team. Hamza's talent is pretty obvious. I am not saying that he does not need to improve or possible make adjustments, but to disregard him his stupid. After 2 year (17 Tests or something) de Villers was avging mid 20's.We had high hopes for Hamza, but now the question may need to be asked as to whether he's another Duminy/De Bruyn who isn't able to take his domestic form up to test level.
The way he has got out and the way he looks facing fast and short pitched bowling doesn't look really bad to you ? Not sure I have seen many that bad watching SA test cricket ? It is the way he is getting out and the build up to it.This is his 5th test and KP is talking ****... He is starting off at 3 in a struggling team. Hamza's talent is pretty obvious. I am not saying that he does not need to improve or possible make adjustments, but to disregard him his stupid. After 2 year (17 Tests or something) de Villers was avging mid 20's.
Burger and Sipamla are the ones lined up. That is pretty clear - even Pollock spoke of those two. Said he watched Burger in the A game ??? Was he asked too ?And KP's implication that SA has no fast bowlers sitting at domestic level shows his ignorance of the SA's domestic players.
I have seen Hamza face fast bowling short to him and he has played it better. I think there is something not quite right at the moment but he looks nervous and tentative more than anything else. Even the way he got out to Bess. And that is more the state of the team.The way he has got out and the way he looks facing fast and short pitched bowling doesn't look really bad to you ? Not sure I have seen many that bad watching SA test cricket ? It is the way he is getting out and the build up to it.
But almost the biggest concern is how he doesn't get behind the ball. So many wickets in SA are caught behind the wicket. Quality test bowlers will milk that deficiency. Probably the easiest one to remedy but the more concerning.
Not writing him off but we might be hoping for too much with Zubs.
Hopefully mate. Want him to come good.I have seen Hamza face fast bowling short to him and he has played it better. I think there is something not quite right at the moment but he looks nervous and tentative more than anything else. Even the way he got out to Bess. And that is more the state of the team.
Hamza has played 62 FC games in SA, which means he has been playing against guys like Olivier, Dupavillon and Nortje (at the very least) in the last 3 years and nobody worked out he could not play the short ball/rib tickler? I am pretty sure somebody would have noticed before.
I don't think that was the case.After 2 year (17 Tests or something) de Villers was avging mid 20's.
The man of whom you want to make this argument is Jacques Kallis, whose average didn't get into the thirties until his twentieth Test.I don't think that was the case.
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
If I'm reading this correctly, his average was 40 after five matches, and while it did dip down to 35, that was after about 30 matches.
It was ODIs where he took longer to make an impression.
Batting records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
I disagree with this article. Hamza needs to get the same time we afforded the other failures like De Bruyn. Like Stephan said , his problem is that he's coming in with our backs against the wall and therefore playing tentatively. If we are willing to back Markram with all his struggles why not Hamza? At some point we'll have to pick players we believe in and stick with them.Thing is, Kallis and Amla were always seen as teenage prodigies with special talents.
Not saying Hamza won't but watching him this series I am massively worried.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cricket...-mounting-field-stand-cusp-going-2-1-against/
I agree. I wouldn't leave him out. Would maybe take the pressure off him and put him to 5.I disagree with this article. Hamza needs to get the same time we afforded the other failures like De Bruyn. Like Stephan said , his problem is that he's coming in with our backs against the wall and therefore playing tentatively. If we are willing to back Markram with all his struggles why not Hamza? At some point we'll have to pick players we believe in and stick with them.
InjuredWhere is Markram BTW? Dropped?