more than just the sample size it's more that he was a much different player then. He never showed any glimpse as being a guy who regularly averages 40+ in first-class cricket at that stage let alone someone who was Test standard. Wasn't until the next year he dominated county cricket out of nowhere and never looked back. Never seen a guy make such a drastic improvement within a year.The key with him like many players will be how he does on a turning track away from home which is out of an Aussies comfort zone. The two matches against Pakistan in his debut series are far too small a sample to say he will fail or be a success so until he plays a few series in those conditions we won't know. Looks the business against pace though.
That's a fair point.So much posts for a guy who averages less than Mayank Agrawal
Both have similar sort of career. Excellent home season, 1 very good series overseas and 1 failure overseas.
There's only one slight problem there, he actually did average over 40 the previous seasonHe never showed any glimpse as being a guy who regularly averages 40+ in first-class cricket at that stage.
so it's a bit of an exaggeration, relax mate. Point is he improved an insane amount.There's only one slight problem there, he actually did average over 40 the previous season
While he has definitely improved significantly, that post pretty much sums up exactly what I was talking about early, there is some blatant revisionism going on with his domestic record.so it's a bit of an exaggeration, relax mate. Point is he improved an insane amount.
I wasn't really referring to his domestic record. I was saying how he looked as a player. The Marnus from 2018 in UAE looked unrecognisable in 2019 in England, at least for me.While he has definitely improved significantly, that post pretty much sums up exactly what I was talking about early, there is some blatant revisionism going on with his domestic record.
That post was always meant to be a general statement for the record, not aimed at anyone in particular
The true definition of a left field pick was Fidel Edwards.Literally arguing semantics.
To HB, a left field pick is simply just someone who was picked despite not being an incumbent. Bumrah in tests might be another example of this. Few wanted him there but he surprised everyone.
Only a literal no-name being plucked out of street cricket a la Wasim is a left field pick up GAS.
Now shut the **** up.
I get the feeling he's Steve Waugh Mk 2 (who looks heaps like Stan McCabe).not really. people underestimate how much it takes to end your career averaging over 50, probably because of the relative glut of the 00s.
the vast majority of batsmen who play test cricket, even the good ones, don't average 50. it's really hard to do especially if you bat higher up like he does. there's a long list of world class players who didn't quite manage it.
labuschagne is probably the most immediately impressive new batsman i saw play last year and i rate him but i'm yet to be convinced he's a 50 player.
I read this after I made my post but it's nice to sort of agree on something with you...I dunno if I wanna make calls about how much he will end up averaging but is it a big call if I say I feel #3 may not be his long term batting position?
EDIT: Not that I think he will fail, but maybe he strikes more as #5 than #3 to me.
I'm no judge of what will happen, and I am happy to admit it. I thought Smith would end up playing a Benaud style role, batting 6 or 7 or 8 and being the main spinner...
Of course, I would never have seen Smith being a 40-averaging batasman let alone his current state so I'm by no means saying Marnus can't be a 50+ averaging batsman.
I read this after I made my post but it's nice to sort of agree on something with you...
Nice cute one. Think not getting some deserved likes.The true definition of a left field pick was Fidel Edwards.
Nice cute one. Think not getting some deserved likes.The true definition of a left field pick was Fidel Edwards.
I'm curious, why do a fair amount of people on here think Marnus is more a #5 than a #3? Is it his looseness wide outside off stump, leading to him continually slicing attempted drives through 4/5th slip?
Well, the simple answer is he looks more a middle order bat than a top order bat. I would have said 4, but how is he gonna get ahead of Steve Smith?