I consider Kallis to be the greatest African player of all time. However, I’m sure more people would have Steyn in their AT XI than Kallis. Does that mean Kallis is not the greatest African cricketer of all time?Do you have Imran in your AT XI ? If yes then please post your team.
Still youJudging cricketers by colour, which is exactly what is happening now in this thread, is considered racist in most parts of the world. So who is stupid?
Pretty simple really, he chucked instead of bowled, has always been the only question about himRegarding Muralitharan, I think there is an extreme bias against him even from the cricketing community.
In the decade of 2000s alone, he took 565 Test wickets, more than what McGrath took in his entire career. He took 335 ODI wickets that decade, more than what Warne took in his ODI career.
Yet a panel of 38 “experts” decided to not have Muralitharan among even the Top 3 players of the decade.
This is again a racist post that Australia hated Sri Lanka players. Anyone that doesnt like Murali is because he was a chucker rather than a real test bowlerA genuine question.
Do most Australian cricket fans have a problem with Murali’s action because they couldn’t accept that someone from a small island called SriLanka was better than their own spinner Shane Warne?
It is a bit too much to expect someone who can't distinguish between what is a region and a race to decipher who is a chucker and who is notThis is again a racist post that Australia hated Sri Lanka players. Anyone that doesnt like Murali is because he was a chucker rather than a real test bowler
The ICC cleared him. But let’s assume aussietragic’s word as the absolute truth.This is again a racist post that Australia hated Sri Lanka players. Anyone that doesnt like Murali is because he was a chucker rather than a real test bowler
Did you read his post or just attack me regardless?It is a bit too much to expect someone who can't distinguish between what is a region and a race to decipher who is a chucker and who is not
Lol. Only thing he is exposing is your own flawed understanding of what that term means. He asked a valid question on who many would think is the greatest Asian cricketer ever. And you brought racism into it.Did you read his post or just attack me regardless?
"Do most Australian cricket fans have a problem with Murali’s action because they couldn’t accept that someone from a small island called SriLanka was better than their own spinner Shane Warne"
How is that not racist in that Australia think SL is ****?
You are ignoring that based on the evidence so far, the number of Indians here who consider Imran the greatest asian cricketer decently outnumber those who don't.Imran Khan is the greatest Asian cricketer. That's really not up for debate. Atg bowler, handy batsman, did outstandingly vs the great team of his time, led Pakistan to a WC win etc. Nothing the other contenders with the exception of maybe Murali really compares tbh. People downgrading him because he doesn't make a few ATG XI is laughable. I've seen someone use the Kallis argument which is legitimate. Kallis is the greatest South African cricketer but he doesn't make many AT XI either. Had Imran been from India, and accomplished for India what he did for Pakistan, this wouldn't be a debate.
Wisden cricketer of the century votesImran Khan is the greatest Asian cricketer. That's really not up for debate. Atg bowler, handy batsman, did outstandingly vs the great team of his time, led Pakistan to a WC win etc. Nothing the other contenders with the exception of maybe Murali really compares tbh. People downgrading him because he doesn't make a few ATG XI is laughable. I've seen someone use the Kallis argument which is legitimate. Kallis is the greatest South African cricketer but he doesn't make many AT XI either. Had Imran been from India, and accomplished for India what he did for Pakistan, this wouldn't be a debate.
I, and many other Australians have no problem with Murali’s action. If people can’t accept that he was cleared by the ICC well thats their own problem. Perhaps they should read the actual papers written.A genuine question.
Do most Australian cricket fans have a problem with Murali’s action because they couldn’t accept that someone from a small island called SriLanka was better than their own spinner Shane Warne?
**** post, no relevance to the topic, obvious trolling. Have an infraction.A genuine question.
Do most Australian cricket fans have a problem with Murali’s action because they couldn’t accept that someone from a small island called SriLanka was better than their own spinner Shane Warne?
You can have one too for starting this whole garbage fire.Such a racist post going under the Radar. Imagine what would happen if it was posted "who is the greatest white cricketer of all time".
Nah.. he did not. And never has been the question against him for most unbiased observers. And FMD, there are cricketing reasons for someone to rate Warne ahead of Murali, not always this crap.Pretty simple really, he chucked instead of bowled, has always been the only question about him