Smith is, Labushaynnne just smashed a bad ballSantner was actually bowling well. Just the one dropped short was a bad ball. I'd keep him on, reckon the Aussies are looking to force him out of the attack because he's a danger to these 2 right handers
isn't that exactly what I saidSmith is, Labushaynnne just smashed a bad ball
Yeah one crook over and spelled says a bit about where KW sees things are heading generally, rather than pointing to him having bowled trash. That sort of slow turn on a deck like this can be effective if you back the bloke in.Santner was actually bowling well. Just the one dropped short was a bad ball. I'd keep him on, reckon the Aussies are looking to force him out of the attack because he's a danger to these 2 right handers
Makes such a difference having a good number three. Those two will go a long way to carrying Australia back to its rightful place of dominating test cricket, particularly with the fast bowling depth they haveJust me getting bored by Labuschagne now? One Smith was enough.
The threat is ever present, that's why Smith and Labuschagne had to be aggressive. Like Sehwag hitting the ball out of the ground because it was swinging too much. Take risks to eliminate the greater risk.Santner was actually bowling well. Just the one dropped short was a bad ball. I'd keep him on, reckon the Aussies are looking to force him out of the attack because he's a danger to these 2 right handers
You guys are reading this completely wrong.The threat is ever present, that's why Smith and Labuschagne had to be aggressive. Like Sehwag hitting the ball out of the ground because it was swinging too much. Take risks to eliminate the greater risk.
The cricketing IQ is immense.