• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread

Spark

Global Moderator
I can’t honestly see the logic in picking Warne over Saqlain or Murali in ODIs.

Not interested in arguing or debating. Just sayin.
So, yeah, this thing you keep doing in this thread where you go "I have one opinion and I literally cannot see how you could have an alternative opinion?"

It needs to end.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
If you put Klusener at 8 then you have to pick a weaker batsman at 7 like Dev/Afridi so there's no loss in overall bowling strength. It's a bit odd.

This is me personally:

Rohit
Tendulkar
Viv
Kohli
AB
Buttler
Klusener
Akram
Murali
McGrath
Garner
Great team. I would just replace Rohit with Gordon Greenidge.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Great team. I would just replace Rohit with Gordon Greenidge.
Any reason?

Their careers overlapped and Greenidge played twice as many games, but he was significantly slower than Abbass, whos frankly ridiculous stats wouldn't even be out of place in today's era.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Any reason?

Their careers overlapped and Greenidge played twice as many games, but he was significantly slower than Abbass, whos frankly ridiculous stats wouldn't even be out of place in today's era.
Greenidge was a superb limited over batsman. While his strike rate is lower, it may have to do with expectations from an opener. He was by all accounts an attacking batsman. One stat that always stood out for me was that he was next only to Viv Richards in number of matches per MoM award (it may have changed more recently with Kohli). That's quite something given how many other legends he would have had to compete with for the award.

Abbas is superb too. I rate him really really highly, above say Ponting. Until emergence of de Villiers and Kohli as ATG middle order batsmen, I used to have Abbas and Dean Jones in my XI.

BTW, here is an amazing bit of stat in favour of Rohit. He has scored at least one score of 150+ in each of last 7 calendar years:

2013 - Rohit (209)
2014 - Rohit (264)
2015 - Rohit (150)
2016 - Rohit (171*)
2017 - Rohit (208*)
2018 - Rohit (162)
2019 - ROHIT (159)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Any reason?

Their careers overlapped and Greenidge played twice as many games, but he was significantly slower than Abbass, whos frankly ridiculous stats wouldn't even be out of place in today's era.
Abbas just not being an opener would be the reason I suppose.

Rohit's been the second best opener in history IMO but I do like the idea of Tendulkar's partner being a bit more aggressive. Watson and Jayasuriya both appeal to me as they give a bit of serious bowling insurance, which I think is particularly important if you pick Klusener at 7. I kind of envisage the step up from regular ODI cricket to whatever sort of competition this team would play in to be similar to the step up from domestic OD to ODI cricket, and as such I don't think I'd really see Klusener as a frontliner bowler. He'd have similar effectiveness to Watson or Jayasuriya with the ball against a team of absolute guns IMO.

My favourite alternatives to Klusener are pretty flawed too though. Pollock has a pretty good batting record and played some top knocks down the order in ODIs but he rarely batted above eight (although I think he could have), and I think promoting someone at the same time as you're taking them up a level is kind of frought with danger. Flintoff has the opposite problem in that he only really batted well at #5 and it'd feel really stupid having him come in ahead of de Villiers and Dhoni just to make sure he had a role he could be decent in. I think Kapil was an inferior ODI cricketer to all these players but probably more suited to the role.
 
Last edited:

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
In my own XI I usually pick Watson as opener and can be open to Jayasuriya too (earlier I was just endorsing a different team). Although having a slightly lesser batsman opening with Tendulkar feels wrong because the opener will deprive Viv Richards, Kohli and de Villiers of lot of balls to bat.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I really think Watson is massively over rated as a LO player around here tbh. Cite whatever stats you want, I always got the impression he'd get out every other ball and was a handy fifth bowler sometimes at best.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I won't cite stats but I remember a couple of his massive unbeaten 150+ scores in successful chases. Made batting look so easy at times
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Is it the highest % of a team total a batsman has ever got internationally? Surely would give Bannerman a run for his money
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Is it the highest % of a team total a batsman has ever got internationally? Surely would give Bannerman a run for his money
Fair chance the opposition openers in one of those <10 all out Maldive Women games could've got close to 100% lol
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Was Smith playing as a bowler in that game?
Smith at that stage was your classic "bits and pieces" ODI player. Surprisingly useful bowler, handy finisher if you needed a late order spark, gun fielder, but didn't hold down a place on any single discipline. His ODI record was actually pretty poor until he was recalled in 2014 - was averaging about 24. Then he dominated for about 18 months, culminating in the WC, and for that period replicated his Test form in ODIs.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Haha yes, this was his greatest knock imo. Up there with the AB's fastest 100 against WI in terms of brutality.

My overriding memory of watching this was that it was very, very, very funny, and it was a crying shame that Bangladesh hadn't put on ~300+ so we could watch Watson getting like 270.

I think Watson'd make the Aus ATXI, and given the historical success of the Aus ODI team, that's no small feat.
 
Last edited:

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend

My overriding memory of watching this was that it was very, very, very funny, and it was a crying shame that Bangladesh hadn't put on ~300+ so we could watch Watson getting like 270.

I think Watson'd make the Aus ATXI, and given the historical success of the Aus ODI team, that's no small feat.
Yeah I remember being so annoyed watching it they only posted 229. He only needed 260-270 to get his 200 that day
 

Top