Ian Chappell suggested Kyle Mills might be NZ's answer to its number 3 problem during the 2004 series after some gritty, technically correct displays.A Guardian poster suggested that Santner opens as 'he's got the technique for it'. Don't know where to start with that one...
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/opini...son-let-loose-the-dogs-of-war-on-david-warnerTim Southee is a fine bowler in many conditions but in Australia he averages over 50 with the ball. Indeed Southee has a very poor record against Australia in all test cricket, a record that spans over 10 years.
So New Zealand can't keep picking him. They will hope that Neil Wagner - that perpetual irritant whose rise up the world rankings is a testimony to his persistence and the feeble indiscipline of so many modern batsmen - gets amongst the Aussies. Wagner took seven wickets out of the 13 to fall in his only test against Australia, including those of Smith and Warner.
But the man who must come in is Lockie Ferguson. He has already got Warner a couple of times in one day cricket. Warner has chopped Ferguson onto the stumps and he has gloved him trying to evade a bouncer. Ferguson's pace and variable bounce have caused Warner bother.
Why are there no warm up games? Smh.
D/N will presumably make that a bit more manageableI see it is going to be 40 degrees in Perth. It is really important that Kane wins the toss and we bat for about 150 overs.
Perth is at least very dry though. O/c that won't make 40+ conditions any more comfortable....given that i hate running in the humidity between 11-530pm in nz in december i don't envy cricketers having to play in perth
Ridiculous - how does this always seem to happen.I see it is going to be 40 degrees in Perth. It is really important that Kane wins the toss and we bat for about 150 overs.
It may be confirmation bias, but Kane seems to be an unlucky tosser.Ridiculous - how does this always seem to happen.
We already really wanted to win the toss and bat, but this makes it doubly important.
They won't do that - funky they are not - but if Boult is fit they may well omit Ferguson which would still be a mistake imo.im just praying for nothing suicidally stupid like 'blundell in, watling to open, wagner and raval out, nz field 3 swing bowlers under lights'
i suppose that could still be even dumber. blundell in his 3rd test at #6, santa elevated to #7 then four quicks who are all memes with the bat.
If the new pink ball does anything at 2:30 in the afternoon on a 40 degree day I don't think it will be for long. And you don't get the second one until you've sweated out 10% of your body weight at the end of the day, and then only for ten overs .It may be confirmation bias, but Kane seems to be an unlucky tosser.
However, at least for this there may be some hope if losing the toss.
Bat: get to bat, everyone likes to bat, 9 players sit inside while it's 40 degrees outside.
Bowl: may be grass on the wicket for a pink ball test, plus get an under-lights session at the end with the second new ball to try to prevent Davey's double hundred.
im just praying for nothing suicidally stupid like 'blundell in, watling to open, wagner and raval out, nz field 3 swing bowlers under lights'
i suppose that could still be even dumber. blundell in his 3rd test at #6, santa elevated to #7 then four quicks who are all memes with the bat.
I'd like to think that line of thinking died out with McCullum, and even then it wasn't really widespread - that kind of selection would be Bracewell-Moles era.They won't do that - funky they are not - but if Boult is fit they may well omit Ferguson which would still be a mistake imo.