honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I remember Warne passed the then record holder (Walsh?) in 2004 in Chennai. So he got the record twice?
Isn't this the match where Langer tried to knock the bails off inconspicously while walking by and tried to claim a hit-wicket?Aus in India would be a losing streak of 7 at most I think. 2008 had a few draws in it.
SL's last draw in Aus was this: https://www.espncricinfo.com/series...nka-2nd-test-sri-lanka-tour-of-australia-2004 which I have zero recollection of or indeed realisation of existence. Actually looks like a fairly competitve game, albeit with Aus having the edge throughout, and a tense finish.
I do suppose it clashing with the football seasons would mean that Fox has less need for it than it does over the summer, but yeah I think they might be more willing to have it than 9 ever was.Yeah, I think the lack of crowds and revenue was given as a reason for their abandonment.
Surely there would be more scope now, especially as Fox would love to have that content.
Of course he wouldn't bitch about it publiclyHardly, its the the rationale of the entire game. Acquiring personal records and pursuing victory aren't exclusive but they can clash and then the former should rightly give way. I mean you haven't heard Warner bitch about missing the opportunity so I don't see why anyone else should
This is a good point. Warner said he was part of the decision making process to declare when they did. If it's not concerning him, it really does become a moot point - unless some people think their own nationalistic jollies are more important than the guy who actually was out there for hours on end.Hardly, its the the rationale of the entire game. Acquiring personal records and pursuing victory aren't exclusive but they can clash and then the former should rightly give way. I mean you haven't heard Warner bitch about missing the opportunity so I don't see why anyone else should
Haha, this is David Warner, remember? Of course he would. He's not smart enough to squash a personal opinion for sake of doing what's right.Of course he wouldn't bitch about it publicly
What do you think he's going to say..."no I want to go for the record"This is a good point. Warner said he was part of the decision making process to declare when they did. If it's not concerning him, it really does become a moot point - unless some people think their own nationalistic jollies are more important than the guy who actually was out there for hours on end.
.
That was very Shakespearian of you, that last sentence.What do you think he's going to say..."no I want to go for the record"
If so, one has no idea about how cricketers act in a group environment.
Its a strange argument when you are relying on what someone hasn't said to justify it. Doesn't matter anyway. His ambitions are secondary to the team's goals. He'd look a dick if he did complain and he'd know it. He's got alot of making up to do. There's no way he's going to make a statement placing his ambition above a captain's declaration. Which means he accepts it despite what his private feelings may be.What do you think he's going to say..."no I want to go for the record"
If so, one has no idea about how cricketers act in a group environment.