_Ed_
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, Taylor certainly deserves a mention. She's ridiculous.James Foster, just, from Sarah Taylor - that pair apart I'd have agreed with LT
Yeah, Taylor certainly deserves a mention. She's ridiculous.James Foster, just, from Sarah Taylor - that pair apart I'd have agreed with LT
Absolutely. I think since it's so difficult to quantify statistically, it becomes much easier for romanticism to come into play.Think it’s interesting that generally, with exceptions, the respect that keepers get is directly linked to how long ago they played.
That just means that your wk skills are something special if a team decides to carry you despite you being a **** bat, which also makes you confused about Nayan Mongia, Parthiv Patel and Tim Paine's inclusion in their teams.And how little they averaged with the bat
Healy certainly, but there's no "romanticism" in the poor rating of modern day keeping. Since the advent of Gilchrist everyone wants his runs in their side. Unfortunately it overlooks the fact that he was also a Test quality keeper, whereas today's selected keepers are not always even full time keepers never mind of high quality.Absolutely. I think since it's so difficult to quantify statistically, it becomes much easier for romanticism to come into play.
I reckon your Ian Healys of the modern era were just as good as your Bari's and Oldfields.
That said, the one discerning element would be older keepers playing on uncovered pitches which would make keeping much harder - particularly to spinners. But it feels unfair to penalise modern keepers for not keeping on these pitches.
Yeah, there's definitely a more prevailing attitude of it's ok for someone to lear 'on the job' with their keeping these days if they're making runs, but not vice-versa. And to be fair, a Prior and Bairstow (just as examples) started off a poor keepers and improved quite a lot.Healy certainly, but there's no "romanticism" in the poor rating of modern day keeping. Since the advent of Gilchrist everyone wants his runs in their side. Unfortunately it overlooks the fact that he was also a Test quality keeper, whereas today's selected keepers are not always even full time keepers never mind of high quality.
What proportion of the time was he keeping to O'Reilly and Grimmett?Its always going to be an impossible discussion this one, basically everyone will pick the best one they’ve seen, making it impossible to compare across eras, due to lack of relevant stats for keepers. One thing I’ve always found interesting though is Oldfield’s percentage of stumpings. Seems quite insane, and was not just at test level.
I always thought he was underrated as a keeper. I think what hurt him was when he had off days they were really bad but they were pretty rare and in general he was a very good keeper. Can't recall him missing much off Warne either.Out of interest, I've heard people say before that Gilchrist wasn't actually a particularly special keeper when he first started playing international cricket - was this actually the case?
equally you see lots of over compensating on here that would have you believe Gilchrist was a top 5 glove man of all timeAnd how little they averaged with the bat
Has anyone implied that? He was a good enough keeper to play Test Cricket purely as a keeper without his batting. But top five of all time, no chance.equally you see lots of over compensating on here that would have you believe Gilchrist was a top 5 glove man of all time
He was outstanding. Underrated because he decided to become an ATG batsman instead.Sangakkara
That's a crazy catch.The first catch in this video is unbelievable. Commentator makes it seem as though it's merely good. Needs to lift his game and scream his head off imo.