Maybe not going in but that's purely because of (well-founded) arrogance imo. By the time OT rolls around, Aus are absolutely taking a draw in that series imo.Nah it's not zero-sum. It goes: winning>>>>>>drawing>>>losing. Neither Australia nor England would have taken a draw going into 05.
The human capacity for self-delusion is almost unbounded so perhaps this is true, but given that "they've not beaten us at home cycle" was actually a thing until people started pretending it was thing in the last three days, I have my doubts.I think when you are 2-1 down and win the last test in the current circumstances, you'd feel you'd had a major let off as an English fan regardless of who's holding the ashes. You'd feel that you've preserved that 'they'd not beat us at home' cycle intact.
Eh?The human capacity for self-delusion is almost unbounded so perhaps this is true, but given that "they've not beaten us at home cycle" was actually a thing until people started pretending it was thing in the last three days, I have my doubts.
The history will show us retaining the urn tooHmmmm, you want the serious answer? Sunday sippers in full flow so cbf tbh.........I'll just say the records will say Eng' s names on the WC trophy, the records will (possibly) show this was a drawn test series.
100%, sucks that they drew here but at least the ****s didn't win. And it keeps 10/11 up there for bragging rights.I think when you are 2-1 down and win the last test in the current circumstances, you'd feel you'd had a major let off as an English fan regardless of who's holding the ashes. You'd feel that you've preserved that 'they'd not beat us at home' cycle intact.
Yeah, really not sure where spark is going with that?
Yeah 10/11 existing probably sugars the pill somewhat.100%, sucks that they drew here but at least the ****s didn't win. And it keeps 10/11 up there for bragging rights.
Mostly that prior to this series, there was no talk about England not having been beaten in a home Ashes series since 2001, it was England not having lost the Ashes at home since 2001. 2-2 would not have been an acceptable result for England prior to this series but an absolutely acceptable result for Aus.Yeah, really not sure where spark is going with that?
Nah. It's always been 'Oz haven't won over here since 01'Mostly that prior to this series, there was no talk about England not having been beaten in a home Ashes series since 2001, it was England not having lost the Ashes at home since 2001. 2-2 would not have been an acceptable result for England prior to this series but an absolutely acceptable result for Aus.
Which goes back to the original point: the average England and Australian fan, prior to the series, would prioritise the Ashes themselves over the numerical scoreline.
I would hope so tbh, even without any series result taken into account that was a much much more consistent and solid all around team than this oneNah. It's always been 'Oz haven't won over here since 01'
Primary goal is retention/regaining the urn, fully agree. But not winning over here was the duck to break.
Similar was being said going into Sydney in 2010 but of course England put that to bed. There's a big difference between how that side will be remembered versus this Australian one, assuming England do indeed win this Test
Fully agree.Nah. It's always been 'Oz haven't won over here since 01'
Primary goal is retention/regaining the urn, fully agree. But not winning over here was the duck to break.
Similar was being said going into Sydney in 2010 but of course England put that to bed. There's a big difference between how that side will be remembered versus this Australian one, assuming England do indeed win this Test
FTR, I'm not attempting to diminish the Aussie achievement of retaining the Ashes. They've done something that's not been done in a long time. All I'm saying is that going into this test 2-1 up they will be very disappointed to not have finished the job (assuming that they don't from here)I would hope so tbh, even without any series result taken into account that was a much much more consistent and solid all around team than this one
Gtfo, that is not anywhere near the same you labotimised sheep.Fully agree.
It might help you see how the world views your WC victory
Oh yeah for sure, but one would think that with the Ashes on the line they would have showed up rather more than they have. They've been pretty bad from ball zip, even taking into account the toss.FTR, I'm not attempting to diminish the Aussie achievement of retaining the Ashes. They've done something that's not been done in a long time. All I'm saying is that going into this test 2-1 up they will be very disappointed to not have finished the job (assuming that they don't from here)