Inspired by some recent discussion, can anyone think of some other significant cricketers who scored fewer first class runs than took wickets? I've got a bit of a list, although I'm not counting things like guys who played barely any FC matches like some who played in the SA vs Eng 'tests' of the 1890s.
B. Chandrasekhar 600 runs to 1063 wickets, including 167 to 242 in tests. Ratio 0.564, 0.690 in tests.
Alf Hall 134 to 234, 0.573
Eric Hollies 1673 to 2323, ratio 0.720
'Hopper' Read 158 to 219, 0.721
Chris Martin 479 to 599 including 123 to 233 in tests. Ratio 0.800, 0.528 (!) in tests.
Bill Bowes, 1531 to 1639, 0.934
Jasprit Bumrah 138 to 144, 0.958
David Larter 639 to 666, 0.959
It does appear that Chris Martin is the king of this statistic in tests but that Chandra exceeds him by a considerable margin at first class level. Bruce Reid scored 93 runs and took 113 wickets in tests, but went 503/350 at first class, Ojha went 89/113 in tests but 847/424 in first class. Infamously bad batsmen who don't qualify included Bert Ironmonger (476/464, much to my surprise) Jeff Jones (513/511) and Chuck Fleetwood-Smith (617/597).