Nah, Saturday and Sunday are supposed to be fine so enough time to get England out twice, especially since they dropped one of their best bats in WoakesGonna be hard to win the Test if we need to take 20 wickets and it's raining half the time
IndeedYou've got to look at Labs unconverted 50s in more context
His last 3 were all top scoring efforts for his team is those innings
Also, the 974 is back on
True, however if he converted 1 of his fifties into a hundred Australia would be 2-0 now with the Ashes retainedYou've got to look at Labs unconverted 50s in more context
His last 3 were all top scoring efforts for his team is those innings
Not if england bowl how they did last night. They gave so much away. It was a terrible performance. Even though the match is rain affected, the looseness of their bowling has let Australia advance the game a fair bit - going at nearly 4s in those conditions is manna from heaven. They're 170 already after only 45 or so overs. The game raced along yesterday.????? That's about 18 overs where he might face 50 balls for 25 runs, so another 40 score?
I think Aus need 400 to lock in the Ashes (will then not lose) so really need Wade and Paine to step up.
It's funny, we were all bitching about the selectors picking him because he seemed like a nice guy and fit in well, and they saw something in him, rather than picking based on weight of runs. Looks like he is evidence that picking on gut instinct sometimes trumps Shield runs.Tbh I always thought Marnus looked a decent player, better than his returns for Queensland suggested. He wasn't impressive domestically last summer, but when you have a closer look the same goes for the entire Queensland batting lineup. Only one Shield century all season across the whole team.
Gabba deck was fairly spicy last season too, how else can an absolute slow-medium plodder like Feldman take so many wickets
The difference is that Marnus had been a fixture in the Queensland side for almost three seasons before he got his Test debutIt's funny, we were all bitching about the selectors picking him because he seemed like a nice guy and fit in well, and they saw something in him, rather than picking based on weight of runs. Looks like he is evidence that picking on gut instinct sometimes trumps Shield runs.
I don't see how that relates to anything I said, but it's still a good pointThe difference is that Marnus had been a fixture in the Queensland side for almost three seasons before he got his Test debut
2015/16: 446 runs at 34.3
2016/17: 626 runs at 36.8
2017/18: 795 runs at 41.8
So while that doesn't stand out, it's not like he was stinking up the place
I probably wasn't too clear, but I was just trying to explain why the Labuschagne and Pucovski situations really aren't that similar in the first bit of my postI don't see how that relates to anything I said, but it's still a good point
Why do you believe any of us give a flying **** what you think? Who do you think you are? Me?Labu’s runs once again prove how clueless most of the Australian posters here are when it comes to selections. Have no reason to trust anything you guys say about little known players anymore.
No FC runs - Why’s he been picked
FC runs - ugh now he’s going to force himself into the team something something Langer sucks
Remember when yall hated on the Chris Rogers selection. Would probably be the best opener in the world if he was playing right now.