• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Test at Headingley, Leeds

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I remember getting into deep and pointless thoughts after watching a video of a deep learning AI learning how to walk and speculating that if you taught such a thing the rules of cricket and let it have at trying to learn to bat it'd probably decide pretty quickly to basically not play that shot at all in Tests. I may have even mentioned it to Spark, the only other person in the world I knew who might've watched that video and also been a Test cricket fan.
But it's so fun. Why do you want to rob cricket of the glorious cover drives of Tendulkar, Hammond, Richards and so on? You heathen, you beast!
 

andruid

Cricketer Of The Year
For the love of God England don't add to your plethora of bad decision making by bowling Stokes into the ground!
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
But it's so fun. Why do you want to rob cricket of the glorious cover drives of Tendulkar, Hammond, Richards and so on? You heathen, you beast!
I don't. I really don't want a world of batsmen who get out to outswingers less but are less fun to watch. That'd be absolutely **** on two fronts.

If I was a batting coach or a professional batsman I might though.
 

Flem274*

123/5
the best way to bat in ricky ponting cricket 2005 was to shuffle to off stump and smash it for six through the onside.

driving outside off was always a terrible idea on test difficulty to the genuine speedsters and to the medium pacers who were randomly fast at max pace like razzaq.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I remember getting into deep and pointless thoughts after watching a video of a deep learning AI learning how to walk and speculating that if you taught such a thing the rules of cricket and let it have at trying to learn to bat it'd probably decide pretty quickly to basically not play that shot at all in Tests. I may have even mentioned it to Spark, the only other person in the world I knew who might've watched that video and also been a Test cricket fan.
I think everyone in the game knows it deep down, but won't accept it. Fielding teams are invariably happy to see an opposing batsman cover drive, at this point every time I see it I can already hear Michael Holding in my head saying "but they won't mind that". But then it's their turn to bat, and every one of them thinks they're the exception. And it looks so good, so no one wants to make the case that it should disappear from the game. Except robots like us.

How much would Alastair Cook have averaged if he'd never once played a cover drive? I honestly reckon 60+. He came close to putting it away altogether for a few years under Flower and was getting more than that. Maybe with a strike rate of 35, but whatever.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
the best way to bat in ricky ponting cricket 2005 was to shuffle to off stump and smash it for six through the onside.

driving outside off was always a terrible idea on test difficulty to the genuine speedsters and to the medium pacers who were randomly fast at max pace like razzaq.
This is true on the better/newer cricket vidya games as well. It seems like a bit of a cheat but maybe it's exactly entirely realistic. :ph34r:
 

Top