It's a day-by-day thing I think.Any words on TPC
That Burns wicket might be Siddles last. 219 (test wickets) is a pretty Aussie number. I remember when Taylor and Slater both had 219 as their highest test scores.So everyone bar Langer agrees Siddle shouldn't play. Pattinson simply has to return. Starc to miss out again.
Why? Do you think Australian doctors will send a sick man out to a possible death because it might increase their chances of winning the series?The decision on whether or not he’s allowed to play should be made by a concussion specialist independent of Cricket Australia.
I'm always thrown out by you being British since you have brumby in your nameShould Smith be allowed to play?
Of course he wants to, any player worth his salt would, but from a duty of care standpoint?
CA's concussion guidelines seem uniquely lax, in having no mandatory standdown.
Cards on table, I don't want him to play, being English and that, but players' health must transcend parochial rivalry or short term expediency, surely?
In other sports he'd already be ruled out. I guess cricket rules are different. Not sure I'd want Root playing if it was him who was hit despite the importance of the test to the series result.He really shouldn't be allowed to play. Concussion is minimum a week recovery.
Not a doctor though etc etc
Decision should be made by an EnglishmanThe decision on whether or not he’s allowed to play should be made by a concussion specialist independent of Cricket Australia.
Cricket seems slightly behind the likes of the NFL in terms of concussion management.In other sports he'd already be ruled out. I guess cricket rules are different. Not sure I'd want Root playing if it was him who was hit despite the importance of the test to the series result.