• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd Test, Lord's, London

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Problem with this field to Smith is England are having a bob each way. I think they need to pick a side of the field and focus on it. Either stick to full outside off and stack the off side, or focus on attacking the stumps but put 5 men on the leg side to restrict the easy singles
Isn't the current argument you bowl 5th 6th stump, but place the field protecting the leg side for when he shuffles across and flicks it?
 

quincywagstaff

International Debutant
I think Smith's troubles in Bangladesh were more to do with mental fatigue from hitting three hundreds in India than anything the Deshis were doing.
There was a 5 month gap between the tours. A more likely reason perhaps was the industrial action that occurred between the tours.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Compared to his record against all other bowling I'd say it's a pretty big weakness. And with regards to spin, it's not like he's had major problems against other types of highly regarded spinners.
Let me put it this way, it would be a really bad reason in selection to choose the worse overall bowler against Smith just because he's SLA.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Isn't the current argument you bowl 5th 6th stump, but place the field protecting the leg side for when he shuffles across and flicks it?
I'm saying the problem with that is you still have to protect both sides. The single to leg is too easy with that plan, if they bowl a bit straighter they might have the off chance of getting an lbw and they can put another couple on the leg side to block off some of those singles
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Let me put it this way, it would be a really bad reason in selection to choose the worse overall bowler against Smith just because he's SLA.
Like choosing Doherty in 2010 against KP. That was dire. That said I think Leach is better than Moeen.

The thing I noticed a bit when Smith was batting against left arm spin was that the crosswise movement was getting him in a bit of trouble with the turn away, effectively putting his outside edge further outside off than normal. That said, that was before he scored all those runs in India.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Like choosing Doherty in 2010 against KP. That was dire. That said I think Leach is better than Moeen.

The thing I noticed a bit when Smith was batting against left arm spin was that the crosswise movement was getting him in a bit of trouble with the turn away, effectively putting his outside edge further outside off than normal. That said, that was before he scored all those runs in India.
Yeah that was exactly the example I was going to bring up.

I think Smith does sometimes push with his hands out a bit at the line of the ball sometimes against spin which can be hazardous to both edges, but that's really about it.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'm saying the problem with that is you still have to protect both sides. The single to leg is too easy with that plan, if they bowl a bit straighter they might have the off chance of getting an lbw and they can put another couple on the leg side to block off some of those singles
While wearing a blindfold and can't see the ball?
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Geez this is tough work out there atm.
Smith aside, England's have bowled and batted better than Australia this series so far. I definitely rate the English attack in this test higher than the Australian attack in either test.
 

Top