It's fair enough if you're not missing many then suddenly nick one, but if it's hitting the stumps and you don't get anything on it then you're out. You only get to make that mistake once.There really hasn't been a huge amount of consistent movement, and yet we're 4 down.
What about humidity? I find a lot of cloudy days in England are too cold for the ball to really swing. Warm day after overnight rain or whatever and it really hoops.The actual scientific evidence on the relation between clouds, lights and swing is very far from certain.
Yeah it hasn't done anything like as much as in the Ireland game the other week though that pitch had far more grass on it.There really hasn't been a huge amount of consistent movement, and yet we're 4 down.
Likely. Don't forget how bad Paine was in England's first innings at Birmingham.Has Paine hilariously outdone Root's terrible captaincy?
nah I wouldn't have all day to post on cricketweb if I was a junior doctorSo you're a doctor? Or am I way off here
If JediBrah is a doctor I'm about to rethink my lifeSo you're a doctor? Or am I way off here
Pharmacist?nah I wouldn't have all day to post on cricketweb if I was a junior doctor
It likely doesn't help that the pitch is so dry. Microclimate definitely has a little to do with it.What about humidity? I find a lot of cloudy days in England are too cold for the ball to really swing. Warm day after overnight rain or whatever and it really hoops.
Nah we haven’t blown it at all with that decision. Seriously - 260 AO day two and 1/30 in reply of a four day test is fine. As much as it’s a semi-regular occurrence, you can’t assume you’re going to collapse all the timeDepends on if they get Smith out....or when the rain hits. Our 6-11 looks really unconvincing in this case.
Frustratingly I think we've played the better cricket, but have blown it by the decision to bowl when the skies were clear.
There's some theories, and possibly a combination of factors may be at play, but there's actually no confirmed mechanism to make the ball swing more when it's cloudy, cool, humid, under lights, whatever, at least in any of the papers I've read. It's one of cricket's semi-mysteries. And the idea that it will seam more when cloudy or under lights is obviously silly.What about humidity? I find a lot of cloudy days in England are too cold for the ball to really swing. Warm day after overnight rain or whatever and it really hoops.
It feels like a **** era for captaincy IMO. Obviously it's difficult to truly know what makes a great captain but I feel like only Faf and maybe Kohli seem above average to me. And the latter has just as much (if not more) down to galvanisation and leading from the front rather than good tactics.Has Paine hilariously outdone Root's terrible captaincy?
The movement doesn’t have to be consistent to get you four down.There really hasn't been a huge amount of consistent movement, and yet we're 4 down.
It's not swinging at all, that's the thing. All the movement is off the pitch.England have bowled very well since about 8:30 tonight.
Head was always going to be found out in swinging conditions. I have absolutely no faith that he has the footwork to survive the swinging ball.
Watching Smith leave is so entertaining.
This. We've definitely got the worse of conditions but I wouldn't say we've played the better cricketHow the hell did you arrive at this conclusion?
Yeah, lots of them are doing the play by numbers craptaincy book and look ordinary.It feels like a **** era for captaincy IMO. Obviously it's difficult to truly know what makes a great captain but I feel like only Faf and maybe Kohli seem above average to me. And the latter has just as much (if not more) down to galvanisation and leading from the front rather than good tactics.
You're right, I'll stick around to watch Wade get his 2nd 100 on the trotthow could you not find this entertaining? he's also arguably your second best bat ever, that's something every aussie tragic should want to watch