Jarquis
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Winning games of cricket has the square root of **** all to do with what you'd rather watch though.Doesn't need Burgey, faster is better, would much rather watch 150+ bowling any day of the week
Winning games of cricket has the square root of **** all to do with what you'd rather watch though.Doesn't need Burgey, faster is better, would much rather watch 150+ bowling any day of the week
Right, because Lillee, Thommo, Lee, Johnson, Starc, etc have never totally destroyed opposition batsmen to win the game lolWinning games of cricket has the square root of **** all to do with what you'd rather watch though.
Yes they did and so did McGrath.Right, because Lillee, Thommo, Lee, Johnson, Starc, etc have never totally destroyed opposition batsmen to win the game lol
Having a guy who is at the worst the 5th greatest fast bowler of all time in your country's 4th XI is pretty much just as egregiously wrong. Apparently an average of 21 in the most batting friendly era ever doesn't count. Even Burgey isn't with you on that one, lol.Actually I dont think I rate McGrath in the top 10 Australian pacers, I mean that puts him in the 4th XI. So more than likely I want my pace bowlers to have actual pace. ffs Shane Watson bowled faster than McGrath.
As for Steve Waugh, one of the most boring batsmen ever. Would much rather have Mark Waugh, Dean Jones, Kim Hughes and Greg Chappell fill my middle order
Really, worse than having Australia Hall of Famer, ICC Hall of Famer, Australian XI of the century player at 83 all-time. In good faith, McGrath could make the Lead bowler of 3rd XI, or maybe first change bowler of 2nd XIHaving a guy who is at the worst the 5th greatest fast bowler of all time in your country's 4th XI is pretty much just as egregiously wrong. Apparently an average of 21 in the most batting friendly era ever doesn't count. Even Burgey isn't with you on that one, lol.
Yes, not staggeringly good either, I hasten to add.This is really a staggering assessment
Dismissing McGrath because he did not bowl fast enough is the completely stupid. That he was extremely effective at a slower pace just shows how skilled he was as a bowler. There is a lot of difference between selecting a team that you like and selecting the best team possible.Actually I dont think I rate McGrath in the top 10 Australian pacers, I mean that puts him in the 4th XI. So more than likely I want my pace bowlers to have actual pace. ffs Shane Watson bowled faster than McGrath.
As for Steve Waugh, one of the most boring batsmen ever. Would much rather have Mark Waugh, Dean Jones, Kim Hughes and Greg Chappell fill my middle order
Look, I don't necessarily agree with Lillee at 83 or whatever but it's less hairbrained than this. Would have saved the effort if I'd known you were this much of a drongo.Actually I dont think I rate McGrath in the top 10 Australian pacers, I mean that puts him in the 4th XI. So more than likely I want my pace bowlers to have actual pace. ffs Shane Watson bowled faster than McGrath.
As for Steve Waugh, one of the most boring batsmen ever. Would much rather have Mark Waugh, Dean Jones, Kim Hughes and Greg Chappell fill my middle order