• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Test, Edgbaston, Birmingham

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Had to have that conversation three times tonight.

'You just won the WC, go treat it like a ODI and you'll chase it down in 48 overs. Get Bairstow in at 3'

**** off nimwits. Block, block and block some more.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
You have to feel for Roy. All of his practice against spin is Ali and so he can't be expected to think that a spinner will actually turn the ball.
 

quincywagstaff

International Debutant
Yeah I remember seeing the scorecards.

I think AB was more adaptable than a lot of aggressive batsmen. Had that big innings at Headingley 2008 where he left the swinging ball religiously.
Adelaide 2012 a pretty amazing example of that. 4 down late on the 4th day and survived. Oz so shattered that their entire pace attack had to be replaced for the next Test.
 

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I guess the logic is:

1. Puts more pressure back on the bowler rather than letting them bowl at you
2. If they shut down too much they'll struggle to build a proper innings

Agree they overuse it though.
No pressure on the bowler as we're not chasing this.
No need for a proper innings. Just survive 150 balls.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No pressure on the bowler as we're not chasing this.
No need for a proper innings. Just survive 150 balls.
By proper innings I meant that I think they'll get out before their Cowan's. Didn't really state it properly.

The reason why letting them bowl at you is bad even in this situation is that it makes it more likely they'll get unplayable balls.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah I remember seeing the scorecards.

I think AB was more adaptable than a lot of aggressive batsmen. Had that big innings at Headingley 2008 where he left the swinging ball religiously.
On pure ability he’s probably a top 5 batsman ever. I think his Adelaide 2012 innings is the longest ever test innings without a boundary. He could basically play any type of innings if he put his mind to it.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
You have to feel for Roy. All of his practice against spin is Ali and so he can't be expected to think that a spinner will actually turn the ball.
Moeen turns the ball plenty the problem is his pitch map is all over the shop.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I guess the logic is:

1. Puts more pressure back on the bowler rather than letting them bowl at you
2. If they shut down too much they'll struggle to build a proper innings

Agree they overuse it though.
Compared to other sports, cricket is very accepting of players making huge tactical errors as a way of keeping their neuroses under control.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You’re in strife if Lyon is getting right handlers out. Denly looked really assured against him too until he went around the wicket. Good bowling
 

Top