flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Been a while since we were 100-1
Maxwell said it won't happen because politics, dude, but I'd honestly have no issues with Reiffel and Tucker.Depends. I think if you pick an English umpire you probably still have to pick an Australian one too, otherwise if they have an off day the media will be savage. But I agree in principle, especially given how Australia/England-centric the Elite Panel is.
Reiffel is poor.Maxwell said it won't happen because politics, dude, but I'd honestly have no issues with Reiffel and Tucker.
Gotta be better than this pair.
Dar used to be top drawer too. Reckon his eyes have gone.
It happened in your last Test innings.Been a while since we were 100-1
First innings when the game is being set up, not a fluke because of a nightwatchman.It happened in your last Test innings.
Leach'd already be on 115*First innings when the game is being set up, not a fluke because of a nightwatchman.
Bowled well, Siddle looks like he lacks penetration and Cummins has looked off but Pattinson and Lyon have both been very good.England reality playing good cricket here. They've survived the new ball, have 100 in the board for the loss of just one wicket. Really they should be looking for no less than 350 from here.
Thing is, Australia haven't bowled badly. Pattinson could easily have had two and Lyon one so far.
About the only bad ball he has bowled today. Guess after so many injuries the question is how he comes back for 2nd and 3rd spells. Soon find out.Having said that, Pattinson bowls a leg stump half volley.
Got smashed a bit that over. It does seem like these two are taking up the intent. Will be interesting to see how it'll work.About the only bad ball he has bowled today. Guess after so many injuries the question is how he comes back for 2nd and 3rd spells. Soon find out.
Bancroft tried, played and missed though.Fmd
Australia must have kicked a dog