Starfighter
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not, it's not a stretch. Not at all.No it doesnt, but saying its a bad decision on that occasion was a stretch.
Not, it's not a stretch. Not at all.No it doesnt, but saying its a bad decision on that occasion was a stretch.
Yeah Bairstow is also usually pretty bad himself in calling for a review. Sometimes convinces Root to go for one when it was never really closeThat is where someone like Prior was perfect, he would get the majority of calls right from behind the stumps and was about the only person able to reign in Broad who would review as often as Shane Watson if he could. Bairstow isn't in the same league as Prior was, Haddin was decent at it. Not seen enough of Paine but that wasn't a good one.
I rate Markram and Elgar. All the other combinations suck immensely.Does any team have good openers these days? I'd be overjoyed if we regularly had 22 opening partnerships.
He is either brilliant or terrible, if we are on top he is good but if it is tight he goes for a punt too often.Yeah Bairstow is also usually pretty bad himself in calling for a review. Sometimes convinces Root to go for one when it was never really close
I hate the fact that we're evaluating keepers on this.Kind of an unwanted consequence of the system that knowing when to review becomes a really, really important skill for keepers. What Paine just did is the equivalent of dropping a sitter.
All part of the package now though. 25 years ago we weren't discussing how good a bat they were and basically becoming a 7th top order player but we take it for granted now.I hate the fact that we're evaluating keepers on this.
All the cruddy luck and hair tearing stupidity seems to happen when I'm watching and all the brilliance when I'm not. Perhaps I should watch the football.Should have been 2 down by now.
It's kind of the opposite of what happened in baseball, where technology revealed that the most important skill for a catcher was catching the ball in a way that made the umpire think it was a strike.I hate the fact that we're evaluating keepers on this.
Jeez, can you explain more how this works, please?It's kind of the opposite of what happened in baseball, where technology revealed that the most important skill for a catcher was catching the ball in a way that made the umpire think it was a strike.
Called "presenting" I believe, basically angling their glove/body to make it look like they caught ball inside strikezone.Jeez, can you explain more how this works, please?