wickets in handNah I think people have heard of it but just didn't really care about it until it decided a World ****ing Cup.
Again though I can't think of any superior method in which NZ would've been adjusted to have won.
God hates nzi mean the really colossally unfair thing was the "six". seriously, wtf.
Nope... and this is where England won the game. On pure luck. Great match, but seriously WTF...Could have anything been done about the deflection 4 runs from stokes
Been saying it for years. It should be dead ball.Could have anything been done about the deflection 4 runs from stokes
But he did apologise.England win the Cricket World Cup due to Stokes accidental Six. Is this a joke?
You could argue total wickets was a better differentiator than boundaries. Still obviously not ideal but it was the common way of deciding ties pre-Super Over.Nah I think people have heard of it but just didn't really care about it until it decided a World ****ing Cup.
Again though I can't think of any superior method in which NZ would've been adjusted to have won.
Aside from changing the rules to reflect long-standing convention before the tournament, no.Could have anything been done about the deflection 4 runs from stokes