That's what I've enjoyed. NZ are ahead because they've played better cricket for the entire match. It will require India's playing better cricket to win from here. It's good watching for a partisan neutral.Funny thing is I don't think its the pitch (though its far from a road). It's just been a mix of batting pressure and great bowling. Boult and Henry used the swingning conditions excellently, Ferguson has been hostile and Santner has been very tight. Excellent stuff from NZ
What Wagneri love that on a deck and against two attacks where you have to work hard for your runs, lord colin scored a bright and breezy 16 off 10 balls with no timing issues
truly a sensational talent hampered only by being the dumbest batsman in cricket
Please don't.Oh, well. Time to kill myself
You know if it's Australia in the final Kiwis would choke hardAssuming New Zealand get through this... any changes for the final?
lol good excuseTo be fair, it was very tough for India since the had the contend with the combined pressure of chasing in a WC semi and a billion fans.
You can't even imagine the sheer #pressurelol good excuse
honestly, no idea. He was in pretty poor form in the leadup. But if Rayudu isn't the answer, then why did he get 3 years worth of JAMODIs in our middle order, when that time could have been spent grooming a better prospect? The Indian management will sometimes stubbornly stick with out of form players on the basis that they trust them to do the job and produce results eventually. But Rayudu was dropped on the eve of the tournament they were meant to be preparing him for. Whether or not Rayudu would have saved India today doesn't take away from the fact that it was really poor player management.Do you think Raydu would've made a difference here ?