• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Semi Final - India v New Zealand

Who will win the match?


  • Total voters
    26

Moss

International Captain
They don't even need to attack the spinners. Just need to actually hit more than 1 or 2 singles every over
Well, this "approach" may yet be justified if they can see off the spinners and REALLY take toll of the fifth bowler.
 

cnerd123

likes this
Got to give credit to India for dropping Shami and going with two spinners here. Plan has worked a treat.
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
I agree that the management of muscle injuries is often atrocious, but you can't always assume that it's a tear from watching on TV. Maybe 10-15% of the time it looks like a hamstring or groin strain but it's not a full tear and can be managed for the rest of the game.
right, but they're not doing any actual "treatment" are they? Like, if the guy is fine to continue, he's fine to continue, if not he's not - there's nothing the physio (or anyone - doctor, nurse, witch doctor whatever) can do in that situation.

The reason I said that is in reaction to the commentator saying re: Pandya's injury "if any man can fix it, it's that physio [can't remember the name]".

They might help with the rehab and making sure muscles heal well but I don't see an acute role.
 

Top