In the few times I've seen Blundell bat (which is a very small sample size admittedly) I've been rather impressed by his temperament and he seems to have a certain drive to succeed. Going by the numbers 50 over cricket isn't his format, but I have a hunch he wouldn't let himself down if he were given the chance against the Aussies. Selecting him would probably be too radical a step for the current think tank however.
Has been for a while now to many of us.
He's not yet good enough to score runs v strong opposition. Plus his keeping is gash. His time will come.
He was from the first day he played. He just clearly doesn't have the mindset and ability to be an attacking bowler. In fact I think he might've bowled better this morning if he actually tried to operate defensively as he usually did. He seemed to have no real plan, apart from operate into the footmarks then get inpatient when things didn't happen every 2-3 balls. I know his figures looked decent but he actually bowled quite averagely. The amount of times he was hit square was poor. And either he set poor fields or Kane did.
This wasn't the full strength Indian attack, but Seifert looked so good in this series.