Nicholls will come in, if NZ lose heavily todayPrediction - Munro to play
It's either that or feed Nicholls to the wolves against Starc and co. So either way we can probably expect carnage.Prediction - Munro to play
Nicholls has test-cricket batting chops and has repeatedly shown an ability to handle pressure. This world cup, and even the final in the last one, show that cake counts. Success isn't assured with Nicholls, but with Munro, failure is guaranteed.It's either that or feed Nicholls to the wolves against Starc and co. So either way we can probably expect carnage.
Not much on this game for Aus, other than maintaining a winning streak and finishing in pole position. Might be an opportunity to experiment with the batting order? Smith at three? Shitcan Stoinis?A small part of me doesn't care if we lose this one, just so that England's semi chances can tank.
How does it really affect England?A small part of me doesn't care if we lose this one, just so that England's semi chances can tank.
Munro's continued selection in the past 12 months has been a classic example of the sunk cost fallacy.Munro looked pretty ordinary in the Big Bash I don't know why you would expect him to succeed in the WC against full-strength international teams.
Would you prefer to play us or Pakistan?..A small part of me doesn't care if we lose this one, just so that England's semi chances can tank.
Not great. He's going through shoulder reconstruction surgery, and has a 6-9 month estimated recovery time.How is Will Young and can he open after the WC?
I saw that he did quite well on a NZ A tour to Aus, he scored heavily against a Aus A attack featuring their WC bowlers.
Would you prefer to us or Pakistan?..
Pakistan on their day can beat anyone and they seem to be peaking at the right time.
New Zealand's points tally being higher, so less margin for error. Though I thought they were on less than 11 points.How does it really affect England?
At this point, it's clearly just a case of them not wanting the mistake to go down as a mark against them permanently. If they keep throwing games at Munro maybe he'll come off at some point and they'll be validated. It was the same with Hesson selecting Ronchi for a laughably long period while he was failing.Munro's continued selection in the past 12 months has been a classic example of the sunk cost fallacy.