It's like Pretorius not getting smashed but worse, isn't itThat over was complete trash and the fact that it took a wicket is a classic example of the winning side just winning
The Hong Kong Sixes uses the height of the stumps as the no-ball limit.Personally I think that ball is still too high to be fairly hit by a batsmen. I'd like to see the no ball limit lowered a bit.
The rule is not about 'being too high to be fairly hit by a batsman'. The rule is about 'being too high to be dangerous for a batsman'. There's no need to change.Personally I think that ball is still too high to be fairly hit by a batsmen. I'd like to see the no ball limit lowered a bit.
Yes, I am suggesting to change the law as i don't like rewarding terrible bowling.The rule is not about 'being too high to be fairly hit by a batsman'. The rule is about 'being too high to be dangerous for a batsman'. There's no need to change.
Why is a full toss terrible bowling?Yes, I am suggesting to change the law as i don't like rewarding terrible bowling.
A full toss of that height isn't deliberate. I don't feel massively strongly about it, just seems a bit crap.Why is a full toss terrible bowling?
I'd like to believe it was an intentional plan to set Andile up to chip a full toss straight to cover. Top quality bowling straight out of the ****-gets-wickets playbook.A full toss of that height isn't deliberate. I don't feel massively strongly about it, just seems a bit crap.