Not really, he was down on pace on comeback and has been gradually slowing further since.When did Amir lose pace? When he initially came back he was still quite sharp
Yup, 0/40 in 3.4 seems appropriate.Wahab reigniting the energy from that 2015 spell against Watson.
That 0/40 came in 2.4, his first over was a maiden.Not really, he was down on pace on comeback and has been gradually slowing further since.
Yup, 0/40 in 3.4 seems appropriate.
With nrr being an issue later on, wi did the right thing. Screw application when you're chasing success a meager target.Two teams that showed very little application with the bat on, what must be said, was an excellent surface
What sort of "application" do you need in a chase of 105? Run it down ASAP. You don't get extra points for being none down at the end.Two teams that showed very little application with the bat on, what must be said, was an excellent surface
Also I think our batting lineup has learned a lot from playing England and observing their mindset. For the last few years we were playing old fashioned cricket, batting the 50 overs, not rotating the strike very well etc. Now we just keep going hard (everyone except Bravo anyway) even if wickets fall. I would rather we get bowled out for 250 in 35 overs trying to get the big totals needed these days then bat out the overs and fail to get 300.What sort of "application" do you need in a chase of 105? Run it down ASAP. You don't get extra points for being none down at the end.
Solid call, this.WI by six wickets in the 42nd over
Obviously application wasn't meant to indicate plodding along to the target. Mindless slogging and attempts to pull off the front foot shows a complete lack of understanding of how to play on that pitch - you can easily score at 8-9 an over by playing square and behind the wicket or just knocking the ball around and getting Gayle on strike.What sort of "application" do you need in a chase of 105? Run it down ASAP. You don't get extra points for being none down at the end.
I think they will bat Hope at 3 against Australia with Lewis coming in for Bravo or Pooran. Hope averages over 100 opening but I don't think he and Gayle make for a good pair. When Gayle retires Hope will move up to open IMO and be extremely successful there, but he needs a partner who rotates the strike.Obviously application wasn't meant to indicate plodding along to the target. Mindless slogging and attempts to pull off the front foot shows a complete lack of understanding of how to play on that pitch - you can easily score at 8-9 an over by playing square and behind the wicket or just knocking the ball around and getting Gayle on strike.
My sense is that someone like Hope may be better served batting at 3 with Evan Lewis opening, I am not sure if the Gayle/Hope partnership is the right way to go.