And then the Leverkusen captain,one Michael Ballack led Germany to choking in the World Cup final. IIRCLeverkusen's in the early 2000s was the funniest one. Had a 5 point lead with 3 games left and managed to choke it away. Also lost the cup final and the champions league final all in the space of like 2 weeks.
If it happens at all.The liverpool choke will be glorious.
Ballack was suspended for the final tbf.And then the Leverkusen captain,one Michael Ballack led Germany to choking in the World Cup final. IIRC
All true but Liverpool's fans are Liverpool fans and therefore any time they win anything it's an apocalyptic disaster.Even speaking in neutral terms, I'm not sure I see why it'd be good for Liverpool to choke and City to win the league. Like I don't see the fun in a team which won the league last season, with a dubious financial fair play record, winning back-to-back leagues. Surely for a better league, it'd be best if there was a degree of competitiveness.
I think the opposite is also true. Whilst Liverpool winning the title would really annoy a lot of people, including me, it will also actively please a lot of people (more so than if City win it anyway). Which I think probably will magnify the annoyance whenever it eventually happens.I'd like to see Liverpool win because it's the outcome which would make the most number of people really annoyed.
Yeah, I love Chelsea fans bringing Gerrard's slip up because of the obvious response.I mean, even I can't put it at anything lower than a par with John Terrys slip...
Yeah but Terry's slip benefitted United, so nobody can really enjoy it that much.I mean, even I can't put it at anything lower than a par with John Terrys slip...