• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* India Tour of Australia 2018/19

91Jmay

International Coach
That drop by Pant really was as easy as it gets. Keeping can be improved massively though, far more easily than batting/bowling so should stick with him. Bairstow is a solid keeper now but was an absolute disaster when we first picked him. Same with Prior.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Well, it's inventive thinking and could've been worth a look in if India had made only about 475-500. Not so much as of now.
I don't think it would be worth a look. You'd need to make more runs than India anyway, declaring behind (or slightly ahead even) just means you'll have to make more in the 4th innings when batting's harder.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ooh, there was something there for Kuldeep.

Would've been amazing if Pant had hung on to that catch, but can't complain about the day.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That opener, Owen Rock averaged 94 from his 6 FC games. Ended his career abruptly to become a doctor. Interesting. Fred should write an article about him
Funny how times change. Maybe if we paid sportsmen more back then we'd never have cured polio
 

Arachnodouche

International Captain
I don't think it would be worth a look. You'd need to make more runs than India anyway, declaring behind (or slightly ahead even) just means you'll have to make more in the 4th innings when batting's harder.
I think his idea is solely a punt to move the game forward. If they commit to it, they still have to make 423, declare, and hope to bowl India out for 100. None of which is happening on this pitch, but what else can they do from the backseat? 423 is a more realistic target to aim at anyway.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I think his idea is solely a punt to move the game forward. If they commit to it, they still have to make 423, declare, and hope to bowl India out for 100. None of which is happening on this pitch, but what else can they do from the backseat? 423 is a more realistic target to aim at anyway.
I mean the only vaguely vaguely realistic way Australia can win this match is if they are still batting in the first innings at lunch on day 5
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think his idea is solely a punt to move the game forward. If they commit to it, they still have to make 423, declare, and hope to bowl India out for 100. None of which is happening on this pitch, but what else can they do from the backseat? 423 is a more realistic target to aim at anyway.
How does that make you more likely to win the game though?
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Pant's a weird one.
Surely there's space for Pant the batsman and Saha the keeper in the same team? Especially as we lack a good #6 anyway.
Shaw and Agarwal should open. Vihari should be given another chance when possible.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
What a day. Hopefully the pitch wears out a bit from here on in. More importantly, we'll need to hold on to all our catches. We deserve 3-1, hope we don't let them escape with a draw.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
How does that make you more likely to win the game though?
I guess it might make India a little confused as to how to bat in the second innings and do something silly in the process.

It's still stupid. Australia's only chance is to get as close to India's total as possible and hope India fart away the test late on day 4/day 5 with an Adelaide 06 style collapse.
 

Top