It depends in which context for mine. For a regular ODI team I would too - I think he was a better player in reality - but if we were picking some time travelling fantasy ATG type team to play another team of similar quality I'd probably rather Symonds. Against ATGs Klusener would have to bat seven or eight and his bowling wouldn't be much better than part-time IMO, and that'd leave him firmly in norounder territory. I think Symonds could at least fudge his way in as a batsman at that sort of imaginary level.Would much rather have klusener than Symonds tbh.
Ahead of?That's why you pick Pollock.
ew noWould much rather have klusener than Symonds tbh.
I thought the fat-shaming was directed at Robbie Frylinck:I like how the first few pages is just fatshaming poor Mark Cosgrove.
CW has a lot to apologize for.
That's what fat is tho.He's not fat, just slightly overweight with a large frame
That's what fat is tho.He's not fat, just slightly overweight with a large frame
so's your faceThat's what fat is tho.
Basically, yeah. Another T20 'sensation' that'll die down soon probably.Who is this Dan Christian? Yet another superstar of the Australian IPL?
I'd say that's pretty much on the money tbh.If he was from any other country he'd have played 100 Tests and taken 500 wickets @ 22 and made 10,000 runs @ 60