oh god we aren't going to do this are wejust seen the kohli catch. this still doesn't look too good.
Yeah. Because literally one blade of grass touching the ball is enough to make it not out it means sweet fa that handscombe had his fingers under some of itjust seen the kohli catch. this still doesn't look too good.
Sums it upOur two best bats at the crease
Tbf, I don'tthink it's a question of perspective this time. The fingers genuinely dont seem to be under the ball there. Looked out in motion though.oh god we aren't going to do this are we
well the fingers could between the grass and the ball, ergo the grass is not touching the ballYeah. Because literally one blade of grass touching the ball is enough to make it not out it means sweet fa that handscombe had his fingers under some of it
perhaps a 2d still frame is an even worse representation of a 3d moving scenario than a 2d perspective-flattened oneTbf, I don'tthink it's a question of perspective this time. The fingers genuinely dont seem to be under the ball there. Looked out in motion though.
That's true. I feel like every cummins innings is between 10-30Sums it up
Having said that, both Paine and Pat have better techniques
Dunno about a blade, looks like a fair bit of it has touched the ground. It's a ****** image though so wtv.Yeah. Because literally one blade of grass touching the ball is enough to make it not out it means sweet fa that handscombe had his fingers under some of it
Yeah but it looks like his fingers couldn't even cover the entire surface area of the ball if you know what I meanwell the fingers could between the grass and the ball, ergo the grass is not touching the ball
what you seem to be thinking of is a geometric impossibly. the ball is not that small that it could protrude out from under the hand.Yeah but it looks like his fingers couldn't even cover the entire surface area of the ball if you know what I mean
He clearly doesn't have all ten near it