Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Nah Afghanistan had a horrible start to the tournament and were relying on a lot of things to go their way to make it.But if they had qualified then West Indies would have missed out wasn't it?
Nah Afghanistan had a horrible start to the tournament and were relying on a lot of things to go their way to make it.But if they had qualified then West Indies would have missed out wasn't it?
19-year old Rashid having the captaincy thrust upon him did them no favours.Nah Afghanistan had a horrible start to the tournament and were relying on a lot of things to go their way to make it.
That's incidentally my little one. Born on 29th Feb 2016Perhaps he was born during a leap-year?
Congratulations! Little Ankit jnr!!That's incidentally my little one. Born on 29th Feb 2016
only to get re-whipped.Wtf we were dominating when I went to bed, how did we lose that?
It's okay we have Sri Lanka to whip around now
Incidentally related Cricket Sri Lanka's diet plan. Extra whipped cream on everything.only to get re-whipped.
So Jadhav was not an all-rounder ever? Wow!One of his last out-of-the-box moves before giving up the ODI captaincy was to hand Kedar Jadhav the ball in the nets in Dharamsala when New Zealand toured in October 2016. Up until then, Jadhav had just nine wickets in nine years of representative cricket across formats, and had bowled less than three balls per match on an average. But all that was to change soon.
Haha yeah there was lots of talk on CW at the time about how random it seemed for him to be bowling at all.How a Dhoni masterstroke turned Kedar Jadhav's career around - ESPNcricinfo
So Jadhav was not an all-rounder ever? Wow!
Good times.I tend to think it's probably only CW who really appreciates how funny the whole Jadhav thing is. It's so much worse than a standard part-timer like Raina or Rohit or someone like that taking some wickets in a series because he's not even a part-timer; he's been a no-timer even domestically until now.
In his defence he's played most of them batting down the order as a wicket keeper (EDIT: wrong; see my next post), and he's a top order batsman who was never going to have any success with the bat in that role.Liton Das averages 13 in ODIs. Why is he a permanent fixture in their team.
six games for an average below 10 is pretty close to being proven horrible tbhIn his defence he's played most of them batting down the order as a wicket keeper, and he's a top order batsman who was never going to have any success with the bat in that role.
As an opener he's more just unproven than proven horrible, although he's played six games there for an average of below 10 as well. I definitely wouldn't be selecting him - his selection becomes worse each game - but it's not really quite as bad as the career ODI stats make it look.
Looking at his record more closely, his non-opening games were actually at three at four anyway, so I must have imagined him batting six and keeping (maybe he did it in some T20 games). It really is actually as bad as it looks, lol.six games for an average below 10 is pretty close to being proven horrible tbh