• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

CW decides the greatest test spinner ever. 43 names: Countdown/Rankings thread

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
We know how far ahead he is on number of wickets, fivers, ten-fers, WPM etc. Here is one staggering stat on his "peak" that lasted 11 years. From start of 1998 to end of 2008, he picked 631 wickets in 90 matches at average of 18.xx at 7 wpm. That's 11 years. And 90 matches.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
We know how far ahead he is on number of wickets, fivers, ten-fers, WPM etc. Here is one staggering stat on his "peak" that lasted 11 years. From start of 1998 to end of 2008, he picked 631 wickets in 90 matches at average of 18.xx at 7 wpm. That's 11 years. And 90 matches.
How many against Australia and at what average? Asking for a friend.
 

SJS

Hall of Fame Member
Who are we to DETERMINE/DECIDE/DECLARE the greatest ever?

One wishes a word like selects (or similar) had been used instead of ‘decides’ for the title.

. . . not so as to display humility (real or fake) but an understanding of the issue, it’s complexity and near impossibility of the task.
 

Borges

International Regular
Who are we to DETERMINE/DECIDE/DECLARE the greatest ever? One wishes a word like selects (or similar) had been used instead of ‘decides’ for the title.
Why? Decide is the right term; it is consistent with the innate Budha nature of CricketWeb.

We like to place great players into pigeonholes that we create; with firmness, and with absolute certainty - we decide.
A is clearly better than B; C must belong to the ATG pigeonhole, but though D gets close to the edge, fails to actually drop into it; E is a truly wretched ATVG etc.
 

Engle

State Vice-Captain
Individual CW posters ' select ' their Top 10, 20, 25....

Once this has been done, then CW as a group ' Determine/Decide/Declare ' the Top 10, 20, 25...based on the calculated results of the many CW posters.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Who are we to DETERMINE/DECIDE/DECLARE the greatest ever?

One wishes a word like selects (or similar) had been used instead of ‘decides’ for the title.

. . . not so as to display humility (real or fake) but an understanding of the issue, it’s complexity and near impossibility of the task.
You have to decide something to make a selection​. Why argue minor grammatical points?
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Last edited:

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Gawd those ranking websites are awful. Ajmal at 2 made me want to vomit. He didn't even bowl half the time ffs. Same with Narine at 11.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sportskeeda lists written by college kids who do little research are only marginally better.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Gawd those ranking websites are awful. Ajmal at 2 made me want to vomit. He didn't even bowl half the time ffs. Same with Narine at 11.
Hafeez is higher than O'Reilly on that list.

AB de Villiers is ahead of Herath and Grimmett. Even ignoring the fact that de Villiers was obviously not a bowler, he didn't even bowl spin when he bowled. :laugh:

Lasith Malinga and Shoaib Akhtar also got a mention ahead of Grimmett.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Hafeez is higher than O'Reilly on that list.

AB de Villiers is ahead of Herath and Grimmett. Even ignoring the fact that de Villiers was obviously not a bowler, he didn't even bowl spin when he bowled. :laugh:

Lasith Malinga and Shoaib Akhtar also got a mention ahead of Grimmett.
Tendulkar was also there, I think.
 

Top