More the fact that while I'd define it purely by how a bowlers action looks I could swear I've seen one or two people on here use it in a much broader and more nonsensical sense, like player X having a certain aesthetic because they bowl more bouncers than player Y or something silly.
except WasimHolding and Donald have everyone beat on aesthetics.
Is player X Larwood?More the fact that while I'd define it purely by how a bowlers action looks I could swear I've seen one or two people on here use it in a much broader and more nonsensical sense, like player X having a certain aesthetic because they bowl more bouncers than player Y or something silly.
I think it was an eighties/nineties discussion. I wish I can remember who it was or who made the comment.Is player X Larwood?
So it's Ian Bishop, Shane Bond, Pat Cummins and other members of the stress fracture elite then?My fast bowling aesthetic?
I like curving twisting bodies and full swinging balls
Yeah i think Lillee would be in that discussion too. Hadle was well.Holding and Donald have everyone beat on aesthetics.
YeaaaSo it's Ian Bishop, Shane Bond, Pat Cummins and other members of the stress fracture elite then?
Sounds more like a porn movieMy fast bowling aesthetic?
I like curving twisting bodies and full swinging balls