• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ranking the candidates for best fast bowler ever - ~20 contenders

Bolo

State Captain
Putting a lot of weight onto the era question actually leads to the conclusion that Steyn is the greatest, not Mcgrath. They each played half their time in the 2000s, but the 90s were a bit easier than the 2010s.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Putting a lot of weight onto the era question actually leads to the conclusion that Steyn is the greatest, not Mcgrath. They each played half their time in the 2000s, but the 90s were a bit easier than the 2010s.
The early-mid part of the 2000s were way worse than the late 2000s though.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
He's definitely up there but still not quite in the same league
That's fair enough, but I find such assessments mind-boggling to tell you the truth. I was always an admirer of McGrath's bowling. He had enormous control over what he was doing, the greatest slower ball I have ever seen, and was renowned for being the best in the world during his prime. His reputation was built off of his results.

However, had he been, say, Zimbabwean, the world would have seen much less of him, and he wouldn't have had the luxury of playing alongside an outstanding team (in all three disciplines). However, he still would have been great. He would have still be an all-time great, and I can confidently say that cause Pidge always used to get the most out of any scenario that he was in, he used to formulate plans and stick to them, he bowled within himself. He knew cricket was a mostly mental game, and with more experience came better execution. But had he been Zimbabwean I doubt that people here would be suggesting that Hadlee wasn't in McGrath's league, or that anyone who thinks Hadlee is better than McGrath has a brain injury. Or that there is some kind of Bradman-like gulf between McGrath and the next best fast bowler. It's nonsense. All I'm asking is for us to bring this debate back to Earth for a little while.
 

jimmy101

Cricketer Of The Year
I mean, it's just funny how when the question of the greatest ever fast bowler gets raised most Aussies tend to gravitate towards the modern Australian bowler.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
McGrath is essentially the Tendulkar of fast bowling but without the choking and match losing.
 

Bolo

State Captain
The early-mid part of the 2000s were way worse than the late 2000s though.
The middle probably. Not the start. There were still a bunch of great bowlers around until 2002. RSA, India, England, Lanka, Pak were stronger batting lineups at the end of the decade than the beginning. The only one that I can think of that weakened was AUS.

Mcgrath finished in 2007. Steyn started in 2004. The good decade for batting argument applies about equally to them
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Steyn averages over 31 with 42 wickets in 11 matches in the given period though.
McGrath took 133in 29 @ 21.4.
Now this is comparing noob Steyn to peak McGrath but it proves the point that McGrath did better in a worse era for bowling.
 

Bolo

State Captain
Steyn averages over 31 with 42 wickets in 11 matches in the given period though.
McGrath took 133in 29 @ 21.4.
Now this is comparing noob Steyn to peak McGrath but it proves the point that McGrath did better in a worse era for bowling.
Steyn took 44@17, SR of 30 in 2007 alone.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I don't think there's a wide gulf between Hadlee and McGrath. In fact I'd say Hadlee is 3rd and McGrath is joint #1. Aside from his better stats, people are forgetting the defining stat of McGrath's career. 40% top order wickets. There are intangible factors too. We take into account Viv's match winning ability with the bat and his ability to take out the opposition's best bowler, we must also consider that he made Tendulkar and Lara his bitch on multiple occasions. McGrath can bowl for my life.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
1. Ambrose
2. Hadlee
3. Marshall
4. McGrath
5. Steyn
6. Barnes
7. Trueman
8. Walsh
9. Imran
10. Garner
11. Holding
12. Davidson
13. Wasim
14. Lindwall
15. Waqar
16. Donald
17. Pollock
18. Adcock
19. Roberts
20. Lillee
21. Anderson
22. Larwood
23. Philander
24. Bedser
25. Tyson
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
I don't think there's a wide gulf between Hadlee and McGrath. In fact I'd say Hadlee is 3rd and McGrath is joint #1. Aside from his better stats, people are forgetting the defining stat of McGrath's career. 40% top order wickets. There are intangible factors too. We take into account Viv's match winning ability with the bat and his ability to take out the opposition's best bowler, we must also consider that he made Tendulkar and Lara his bitch on multiple occasions. McGrath can bowl for my life.
Ambrose is another bowler who took a lot of top order wickets.
 

cnerd123

likes this
What I'm curious is how much weight people are putting on consistency of performance Vs how good the player was in their peak, plus how much longevity means to them
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He did but McGrath was the best at it, with a higher percentage. Ambrose is top 5 for me but just a teeny tiny bit below.
 

Top