Then it's not a full strength team is it?I can't include Smith and Warner, they are banned
semanticsThen it's not a full strength team is it?
Teams without Warner and Smith in them would only be relevant if people cared about the team for the remaining period of their bans though. By the time the World Cup rolls around and the selectors will even be attempting to pick a full strength side they'll be there, so you might as well include them in any thoughts about what the full strength team is.semantics
It was clear what John was saying though.Teams without Warner and Smith in them would only be relevant if people cared about the team for the remaining period of their bans though. By the time the World Cup rolls around and the selectors will even be attempting to pick a full strength side they'll be there, so you might as well include them in any thoughts about what the full strength team is.
I wonder if Stoinis having such a horrible series will count against him when everyone (perhaps most relevantly Mitch Marsh, but also Smith) is available again. I'll back him in for the WC squad but I can see him finding himself outside the first choice eleven if he doesn't score many between now and when it starts.
Yeah but I think TJB was more just saying what I was saying rather than being semantic. What John was doing kind of doesn't matter.It was clear what John was saying though.
Yeah it was clear but a strange exercise to be undertaking. I don't really see the point.It was clear what John was saying though.
He actually didn't even say 'full strength' in his post
T20sPretty solid, but could still go with an extra batsman instead of Agar. Lynn, Khawaja, Short, Smarsh or someone. A bit too many "all-roundery" type players from 4-8
He's just made 3 50s in a row.Head shouldn't be in any of the teams anyway though