Well, I am not here to impress with lexicon. I'd rather be understood. Perhapos you found Graham Greene's philosophy of using simple English artless too.I did it because I found the use of the word artless.
I'm sure you do. And yet you piped up and engaged me.Prefer it if he saved typing at all tbh.
You do have a very good point.Prefer it if he saved typing at all tbh.
So like your posts then?Sometimes I struggle to believe most of us here are grown men
Do you have any evidence to support this proposition?Sometimes I struggle to believe most of us here are grown men
Try again. You're almost thereTo accommodate Indian viewers
Maybe for you acuity is no simpler than acuteness.How is writing "acuteness" simpler than writing "acuity"?
I use plain English writing every day in my job. I dumb it down even more when I post on here, because you have to play to your audience.
12 million viewers of Sky in India on a daily basisTry again. You're almost there
Eh, you can be young once but immature forever.Sometimes I struggle to believe most of us here are grown men
The goal is to convey your point with alacrity.Maybe for you acuity is no simpler than acuteness.
But trust me - for the masses aware of the word stem of acute, "acuteness" is far simpler to identify as against "acuity". I know where you're coming from with your job, but your vocabulary of English is stronger than the many in this instance for word stems of "acute".
The goal is not to have people drowned in dictionaries for art's sake. All a writer really needs to be skillful as an artist imo is a strong and wide array of verbs (better if simply identifiable), and not nouns. Verbs matter more than nouns.
Table doesn't have any ramen on it. There's pasta currently cooking, will that do?12 million viewers of Sky in India on a daily basis
833,599 cricketers in UK
1 bowl of Ramen has 350 calories
Refer to Starfighter's table
Not all topics are cheerful.The goal is to convey your point with alacrity.
Is that the same as alacriness?The goal is to convey your point with alacrity.
¿Que?Not .all topic are cheerful.
My literary knowledge?Not content with cutting and pasting the UCPR to prove a nonexistent legal point to a lawyer who’s been at it 25 years, Mr Miyagi is now seeking to impart his literary knowledge upon us.
And to his credit, it will probably be more interesting than this ODI series.
Your face is immature foreverEh, you can be young once but immature forever.