Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

[Mr Miyagi]

lol you literally just have to directly state what your point is if it is questioned and everyone will understand immediately. The issue is you tend not to do that and you use all these other ridiculous "tools of communication" instead.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

You have no answer to that statement, so you must—in effect—use a symbolic form of smarminess to shrug it off and carry on.

 

[Mr Miyagi]

You have no answer to that statement, so you must—in effect—use a symbolic form of smarminess to shrug it off and carry on.

Well this is one, rather unpleasant to my abilities and personality both, interpretation of what I just did and why.

Please, tell me more about myself. Don't worry about getting personal, I think we're already past that point by now.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

Another interpretation then?

And in particular, one that another member might pick up?

Was his statement just that hilarious?

 

[Mr Miyagi]

Another interpretation then?

And in particular, one that another member might pick up?

Was his statement just that hilarious?

I much prefer that you continue to discuss the unpleasant interpretation of my abilities and personality both.

If you want to suggest that there are no further possible interpretations besides than the one you offered previously, you say so and why.

The stage is yours, rip me to shreds.

 

[Starfighter]

I much prefer that you continue to discuss the unpleasant interpretation of my abilities and personality both.

If you want to suggest that there are no further possible interpretations besides than the one you offered previously, you say so and why.

The stage is yours, rip me to shreds.

Well you do tend to narrow the options down.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

You said,

Well this is one ... interpretation of what I just did and why.

If you are saying it is only one interpretation out of others possible, and complaining about the implications of that one interpretation, why not offer up other ones?

For a start, this would show your intentions in a different light, and people may be able to draw out interpretations of your future and past actions other than the one I offered for your reply to TJB above.

 

[Victor Ian]

We know you love Hadlee because you share something in common with him.

 

[cnerd123]

Just call Mr Miyagi a **** and move on


Hey Mr Miyagi, you're a ****


There. Problem solved.

 

[Mr Miyagi]

You said,



If you are saying it is only one interpretation out of others possible, and complaining about the implications of that one interpretation, why not offer up other ones?

This is your opinion about me, you tell it. If there is only one interpretation, you say so and why. I asked you to carry on and told you not to worry about getting personal. Be my guest. Rip me to shreds.

For a start, this would show your intentions in a different light, and people may be able to draw out interpretations of your future and past actions other than the one I offered for your reply to TJB above.

You're the one telling everyone what my intentions behind that post were, and what this says about my abilities and personality. So you keep going. You're doing a great job. You shouldn't need any further information. Look at you what you were able to construe already just from a " "

You have no answer to that statement, so you must—in effect—use a symbolic form of smarminess to shrug it off and carry on.

 

[Starfighter]

Look at you what you were able to construe already just from a " "

Actually, we've been construing it from a lot of your other posts as well.

 

[Daemon]

I'm sorry but this is an ATG thread started by yours truly and it shall not be tainted with weird posting. Behave yourselves or take it elsewhere.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

This is your opinion about me, you tell it. If there is only one interpretation, you say so and why. I asked you to carry on and told you not to worry about getting personal. Be my guest. Rip me to shreds.

I've already told.

You tell your side.

Don't depend on me to provide reasons for you to contest or dispute something.

Look at you what you were able to construe already just from a " "

It was more than just that.

 

[Mr Miyagi]

I've already told.

You tell your side.

No - I am much more interested in you telling yours about me discussing me rather unpleasantly about my personality and abilities.

Don't depend on me to provide reasons for you to contest or dispute something.

I didn't. But I told you you that you were welcome to substantiate your claims about my post of a " " by getting as personal as you liked.

So if you're done discussing me unpleasantly, and as I have no interest in talking about myself on cricketweb right now, lets move on already?

 

[harsh.ag]

Good to see posters taking the "things that don't really deserve a thread" theme to heart.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

No - I am much more interested in you telling yours about me discussing me rather unpleasantly about my personality and abilities.

I didn't. But I told you you that you were welcome to substantiate your claims about my post of a " " by getting as personal as you liked.
So if you're done discussing me unpleasantly, and as I have no interest in talking about myself on cricketweb right now, lets move on already?

So you are deflecting the question I have asked.


And as for substantiation or whatever:

- A person makes an observation and directs criticism at you and how, according to this person, you've cause misunderstanding over whatever points you're trying to make

- Rather than defending yourself or otherwise responding with—you know—words, you reply with 'laughter', something that may be taken to be contemptuous of the point the other made, if not the person making that point*.

This is based just on those posts, with context as to how it got to that point provide by the previous posts in this conversation. Again, you've no proper response.




*So, I may take from this then you are insinuating something about somebody making a point against you. Please, tell me more.

 

[Mr Miyagi]

So you are deflecting the question I have asked.

I've told you already for you to tell your story about my abilities and personalities as unpleasantly as you wish. Once you have finished, that is the topic over as far as I am concerned.

So you can either keep going on about me, or you can cease.

I've already told.

You tell your side.

Don't depend on me to provide reasons for you to contest or dispute something.

No - I am much more interested in you telling yours about me discussing me rather unpleasantly about my personality and abilities.





I didn't. But I told you you that you were welcome to substantiate your claims about my post of a " " by getting as personal as you liked.

So if you're done discussing me unpleasantly, and as I have no interest in talking about myself on cricketweb right now, lets move on already?

And as for substantiation or whatever:

- A person makes an observation and directs criticism at you and how, according to this person, you've cause misunderstanding over whatever points you're trying to make

- Rather than defending yourself or otherwise responding with—you know—words, you reply with 'laughter', something that may be taken to be contemptuous of the point the other made, if not the person making that point*.

This is based just on those posts, with context as to how it got to that point provide by the previous posts in this conversation. Again, you've no proper response.




*So, I may take from this then you are insinuating something about somebody making a point against you. Please, tell me more.

You have no answer to that statement, so you must—in effect—use a symbolic form of smarminess to shrug it off and carry on.

 

[NotMcKenzie]

Q.E.D. for my point.

 

[Starfighter]

I've told you already for you to tell your story about my abilities and personalities as unpleasantly as you wish. Once you have finished, that is the topic over as far as I am concerned.

You keep acting a way that makes you fully deserve your treatment, every time. Your problems around here are caused by you and you alone.

 

[Mr Miyagi]

Q.E.D. for my point.

So you're done talking about me and my unpleasant abilities and personality now?

Because you've said this before and then continued on again.