It's come to a stage where we will be perfectly fine without Dale. Rabada is our gun. Philander still has legs in him. Ngidi has loads of potential and tbh Olivier isn't the worst fourth seamer to have around. But if Dale has proven his fitness, I will set aside time to see him in a Test again.I'm surprised you guys are still so positive about Steyn coming back. Guy has been injured virtually non-stop for 3 years now. Not sure I've ever seen a bowler come back and continue on successfully after such a long injury-riddled spell.
Well he's more of a batting allrounder. I'm guessing he'd be Making the side as a batsmen who can bowl.The biggest thing against Muthusamy is competing directly with Maharaj as a left-arm orthodox...
Mulder will have to come in for Bavuma, Muthusamy will have to come in for a bowler. I've always thought of him as a bowling allrounder but unsure if that is correct ... still the A tour/ Indian spin camp will tell us a lot of where these players actually are.I see a lot of people are talking of Mulder debuting soon but question is, at who's expense? The fact that we gonna be playing in Sri Lanka means we need two spinners. Wouldn't it be better to have a Muthusamy/Von Berg debuting before Mulder?
Want to see him dominate for Leicestershire this season (I mean really dominate) and then come back and do the same for the Warriors because then he is putting a number of seasons together and knocking on the door for CSA to maybe think we need to get him in the system and invest in him (SA A). His build up of good seasons is far better than say P.Malan, R.Hendricks, Agathangelou, van der Dussen for example who are at a similar stage or age in their careers. Also a very handy right-arm off-spinner !Didn't hear the talk but those players, Breetzke, Pillay, van Tonder, looked good. Also G. Coetzee.
I think Ackerman still wants to play for SA but we shall see. Realistically we need 3 or 4 batsmen of those 8/10 to start coming good in the next 2 years and SA are fine for another 5/6 years after that.
I also do think there was a genuine belief in Duminy's talents. Not denying that he probably kept his place for longer than he should have and possibly for other reasons.My fear is SA picking wrong players and sticking with them like Bavuma/Duminy. When you see him play, you know he is not going to score a lot of runs consistently. SA afford to have players like that when Elgar, AB are in the runs but when one of these form players go in a form slump, the pressure will mount on the lesser players. Duminy had a free ride for long but when SA team were struggling, his non performance was highlighted and he got dropped.
Although Bavuma averages 42 in the past twelve months. Admittedly, that's helped a little by a few not outs and he hasn't made any big scores in that time, but he's done enough to keep his place for the time being and it's not as though there's anyone you can say should definitely be picked ahead of him.My fear is SA picking wrong players and sticking with them like Bavuma/Duminy. When you see him play, you know he is not going to score a lot of runs consistently. SA afford to have players like that when Elgar, AB are in the runs but when one of these form players go in a form slump, the pressure will mount on the lesser players. Duminy had a free ride for long but when SA team were struggling, his non performance was highlighted and he got dropped.
He was dominating domestic cricket - didn't he get dropped from the test side and then score a double hundred for the Cobras? So his domestic form kept him there until they finally accepted that he wasn't going to be able to reproduce that form at a higher level.I also do think there was a genuine belief in Duminy's talents.
But didn't that have a lot to do with wanting to play the dream attack of Steyn, Rabada, Philander, and Morkel? As the junior middle order batsman, Bavuma would always have made way, no matter what his record was like.Bavuma is under pressure. I think he knows that. SA were willing to leave out a fit Bavuma for India.
Nothing to argue with in the top part. I was a Duminy fan and I am not afraid to say that just like Rudolph. I was a Stiaan van Zyl and Rilee Rossouw fan too.He was dominating domestic cricket - didn't he get dropped from the test side and then score a double hundred for the Cobras? So his domestic form kept him there until they finally accepted that he wasn't going to be able to reproduce that form at a higher level.
But didn't that have a lot to do with wanting to play the dream attack of Steyn, Rabada, Philander, and Morkel? As the junior middle order batsman, Bavuma would always have made way, no matter what his record was like.
I see a lot of people are talking of Mulder debuting soon but question is, at who's expense? The fact that we gonna be playing in Sri Lanka means we need two spinners. Wouldn't it be better to have a Muthusamy/Von Berg debuting before Mulder?
I agree but when we go to India I do expect nothing but pure raggers now. Be interesting what Sri Lanka throw at us.Do we really need to play 2 spinners in the starting 11?? Isn't an attack of Steyn,KG,Vern and Keshav with some part time from aiden and Elgar enough?
SA for a long time where very successful on the subcontinent playing only the one spinner.
Not sure a sub standard spinner is better then a great reverse swing bowler.