With Starc it's not clear. But when Hazelwood bowls one way down leg it's obvious what's happening.Is this even legal to bowl intentional wides? Pathetic bowling tbh
"Within the line""Hard but fair"
Right. Mind-boggling to me that people were criticising their scoring rate given the quality of bowling. One of them gets out, say, thirty minutes after lunch and SA could genuinely be staring at a first innings deficit. Instead...Under-rated that there are 5 days in test cricket anymore and keeping bowling attacks out in the field to toil.
There's a "negative bowling" rule in place but it's a lot more difficult to get legside trash actually called wides because of it in practice.Is this even legal to bowl intentional wides? Pathetic bowling tbh
Exactly, it was Day 2 FFS. Perhaps if it was Day 3 you could argue they were going too slowly, but it was hardly like they were deadbatting pies.Right. Mind-boggling to me that people were criticising their scoring rate given the quality of bowling. One of them gets out, say, thirty minutes after lunch and SA could genuinely be staring at a first innings deficit. Instead...
I feel pity for you, having never witnessed Rob Quiney's 9That is a fairly solid candidate for the best innings I've ever seen.
ABdV batting at his best is definitely a cut above Smith's best. Smith's strength is more his sheer consistency.So is ABdV that much better than Smith when the Aussie bowlers can`t get him out?
Or are the SA bowlers that much better than the Aussie bowlers that they can get Smith out?
Neither.So is ABdV that much better than Smith when the Aussie bowlers can`t get him out?
Or are the SA bowlers that much better than the Aussie bowlers that they can get Smith out?