He'd be locked up with the history he's had already if he wasn't a cricketer, he's a thug plain and simple.Just saw the clip of Stokes mocking Katie Price's disabled son. Not hard to see he'd act like a right plonker on the turps. Far less sympathetic of him after seeing that. Sort of mockery you'd expect from a 10 year old kid tbh.
I wonder who leaked that, a mere day after the Bristol incident?Just saw the clip of Stokes mocking Katie Price's disabled son. Not hard to see he'd act like a right plonker on the turps. Far less sympathetic of him after seeing that. Sort of mockery you'd expect from a 10 year old kid tbh.
What history is this then or are you talking out of your arse?He'd be locked up with the history he's had already if he wasn't a cricketer, he's a thug plain and simple.
According to the article he was obstructing the police, whom I can only assume were about to arrest a gay couple for a reason that is irrelevant.It is the second time he has been arrested on a drink related incident,
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/cricket/ben-stokes-faces-fight-to-save-158502
His biggest mistake was supporting the NZ WarriorsYou mean moving to England in the first place right
Well we'll await his reasoning there...If it were as clear cut as you’re making out it would’ve been charged earlier and he’d have pleaded guilty under advise from his legal team.
It isn't really an open and shut case because you can't make a judgment on what was going through the minds of the protagonists from the footage aloneIt took the British police five months to charge him, in an open-and-shut investigation where they had the actual footage of the incident, so this thing should drag on for decades.
Yes you can: Stella Artois.It isn't really an open and shut case because you can't make a judgment on what was going through the minds of the protagonists from the footage alone